AS IT HAPPENED: Oscar Pistorius trial, day 28

2014-05-08 09:18
Oscar Pistorius (Gianluigi Guercia, AFP)

Oscar Pistorius (Gianluigi Guercia, AFP)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Slideshow

LIVE: Oscar Pistorius trial, day 28

2014-05-08 09:17

Watch Oscar Pistorius's day 28 court proceedings live here. VIEW




15:02 - Trial resumes on Friday as Wolmarans continues his testimony, still has to be cross-examined by Advocate Nel.




15:01 - Court makes an order that graphic photographs are not to be published. Court adjourned.




14:59 - Abrasion wounds could be related to bullet wounds on upper arm, says Wolmarans.




14:57 - Wounds to show that the Reeva may have been in an upright position, right leg became unstable, causing her to collapse after being shot.




14:56 - Wolmarans says it is not possible to determine the sequence of the shots or position of the body.




14:52 - Holes could have been caused by bone fragments as well, says Wolmarans about the back of the vest.




14:51 - Oscar Pistorius cradles his head in his hands as he listens to evidence during his murder trial in Pretoria. (Gianluigi Guercia, Pool, AP)




14:48 - Attention turns to clothing that Reeva wore, damage consistent with bullet wounds, Wolmarans testifies.




14:46 - 
Bullet defected from a tile, and a piece of the tile fell into the toilet bowl, which Wolmarans recovered.




14:44 - Cricket bat was used to strike the upper right panel, distinct marks match cricket bat, say Wolmarans.




14:43 - Widespread pattern of splinters around the bullet entrance hole, doesn't match the wounds on Reeva's upper arm, says Wolmarans.




14:40 - Pattern consistent with wounds, even though it's wider, says Wolmarans.




14:39 - Witness board pattern shows correspondence with wounds on Reeva's arm, Wolmarans testifies.




14:36 - Witness board presented to the judge for examination, admitted as exhibit 6.1.




14:34 - Roux says that it's difficult to show wood splinter injuries from photographs.




14:31 - Wolmarans ran tests with similar firearm and ammunition on a door from Oscar's home.




14:27 - Wolmarans says that imprint marks of a bullet shows that it was unstable.




14:23 - Wolmarans points to the door, shows that the door is not uniformly thick. Analysis shows that the curve in the wood is an indication of deflection.




14:21 - 
Deflection not taken into account by the police, says Wolmarans.




14:19 - Reconstruction of the door could have impacted the accuracy of the trajectory of the bullets, Wolmarans testifies.




14:17 - 
Groupings of bullet pattern on the door shows a small pattern, says Wolmarans. Factors could have affected accuracy on trajectory.




14:15 - Wolmarans testifies that he measured the door to get consistent results.




14:13 - Wolmarans says that Black Talon bullets are not available in SA, but similar to Ranger rounds.




14:11 - Bullets stays intact when it hits a wooden target, can influence its stability.




14:09 - Bullets in the gun was hollow-point, designed to expand on impact. "This bullet forms like a mushroom when it hits the soft flesh," says Wolmarans, as his phone rings.



14:06 - 
Grooves in the gun's barrel are like the fingerprint's of the gun. [Just like on CSI]




14:04 - Wolmarans explains firing action, and the finger pressure required for double action, single action shooting.




14:02 - Wolmarans explains a self-loading firearm, magazine can be loaded with 17 rounds of ammunition.




14:01 - Court back in session, Tom Wolmarans to explain his view.



14:00 - Tom "Wollie" Wolmarans, a retired South African Police Service forensics expert will testify at the Oscar Pistorius trial. (Themba Hadebe, AP)





13:02 - Court adjourned for lunch.




13:00 - Wood from the toilet door was carefully under Wolmarans's control.




12:56 - Witness found a fragment a bullet in the toilet bowl.




12:55 - Wolmarans examined crime scene while wearing protective clothing.




12:53 - A number of local and international companies have consulted with Wolmarans.




12:51 - Wolmarans has given expert testimony in a number of areas related to firearms' mechanisms, use; analysis in Germany and the US. Employed by the UN in 2000 as crime scene officer in Kosovo.




12:48 - Wolmarans trained in fingerprints, not crime scene and analysis. Gained extra knowledge on war weapons in Zimbabwe.




12:45 - Wolmarans specialised in firearms in police after army, transferred to logistics, employed in confiscated firearms section. Gained knowledge during that time.




12:43 - Roux asks Wolmarans for short CV.




12:41 - Witness says he's Afrikaans speaking, but interpreter may have trouble, nevertheless should be on standby.




12:39 - Wolmarans doesn't object to TV images.




12:37 - Tom Wolmarans, ballistics expert takes the stand for the defence.




12:29 - Witness excused, Tom Wolmarans called, 10 minute break.




12:27 - Roux on redirect: Did Oscar bring the accident into context? [choice of words]




12:26 - Nel wants to know whether she expected Oscar to say "I'm sorry for what I did."



Oscar Pistorius keeps his head down at the continuation of his murder trial in Pretoria. (Gianluigi Guercia, Pool, AP)



12:25 - Nel warming up with "You felt sorry for the accused on the morning of the 15th?" Van Schalkwyk says she has 24 years of experience.




12:23 - 
And... we're back.




12:16 - Nel requests a 10 minute adjournment, granted.




12:15 - Van Schalkwyk performed no emotional tests on Oscar, drug test were done.




12:13 - Nel pushes the witness that Oscar never said "I'm sorry for what I did." Van Schalkwyk wasn't expecting an apology.




12:11 - Van Schalkwyk says: "I was there for emotional support. I saw a heart-broken man."




12:09 - Nel says "It's all about him". Van Schalkwyk can't agree.




12:08 - Nel counters with "He never said 'I'm sorry'" He was sorry about the loss, not sorry about what he did.




12:07 - Nel wants to know how Oscar felt on the day, but Van Schalkwyk says Oscar spoke about Reeva.


-    Before The Oscar Pistorius Trial took a two week recess, forensic geologist, Roger Dixon was called to the stand.


12:05 - What would you expect of a normal person who shot someone, Nel asks Van Schalkwyk.




12:03 - Nel fires at Van Schalkwyk: "He thought he was under attack, so his version changed from the one he told you."




12:02 - 
Nel: "He said to you, I accidentally shot her."




12:00 - Van Schalkwyk doesn't see accused in family murders after arrest.




11:59 - Nel asks: "Did he say 'I shot Reeva?'" "No," says Van Schalkwyk.




11:58 - Van Schalkwyk says Oscar vomited twice, cried. She had to calm him down. Saw him at his home.




11:55 - Van Schalkwyk reads that Oscar had no drugs in his system, coping well. Oscar is "accused is fully compliant with all the conditions".




11:54 - Reports show that Pistorius is "heart-broken", has "normal reactions to abnormal conditions", "giving full co-operation".




11:50 - Van Schalkwyk reports on Oscar marked LLL1 - LLL4.




11:49 - Van Schalkwyk: "I saw a heartbroken man, he cried 80% of the time; he's suffering emotionally."




11:48 - "What she saw and what she heard from the accused, you can't separate it," says the judge.




11:47 - Roux insists that Van Schalkwyk evidence is relevant because it comes from someone independent.




11:45 - Nel objects to evidence, Roux fights it, saying it is in response to the State's case against Oscar.




11:44 - Oscar was genuinely sorry, in mourning over the death of Reeva Steenkamp, says Van Schalkwyk.




11:43 - Van Schalkwyk upset at rumours that Oscar took acting classes, could cry on demand.




11:42 - Oscar looks subdued, head down.




11:41 - Yvette van Schalkwyk takes the stand, worked for department of social development as a social worker.




11:39 - Court back in session, new witness to take the stand.




11:19 - Professor Lundgren excused. Court take a tea break.




11:18 - Roux wants to show that the State's argument is speculative.




11:17 - Roux redirects: "Can you work out time on an hourly basis?" Prof says no way.




11:15 - Prof refuses to say that Prof Simon is wrong: "It's his opinion."




11:14 - Nel questions prof on her testimony that Reeva's stomach should have been empty after six hours. Court tense as prof refuses to comment.




11:11 - Reeva drank no alcohol, took no drugs that may have delayed gastric emptying, prof accepts Nel's view.




11:09 - Anxiety, emotion and the time of eating will delay gastric emptying, says prof, but Nel hits on the length of the delay.




11:06 - Nel says that 2l of food is unlikely, 4l "even less probable", prof retreats to forensic literature.




11:04 - Nel says that post mortem shows 200ml of food in her stomach, implies that Reeva ate 2l of food if she ate at 19:00.




10:59 - Prof complains that her estimates are taken out of context, Nel presses her on the 10% to 4 hours ratio.




10:58 - Prof Lundgren doesn't agree with Prof Simon's view that Reeva ate two hours before death, but "not prepared to criticise a forensic pathologist".




10:55 - Prof reiterates that 10% of a low fat meal remains in the stomach after four hours.




10:53 - Nel refers prof to a bullet point in book: "Digestion may continue after death."



10:51 - Court back in session, Professor Lundgren still on the stand.




10:15 - Nel asks for 30 minute recess, granted.



10:13 - Nel to Prof: After death, gastric emptying stops. Prof says I deal with live patients, but she is unable to find evidence that digestive enzymes continue to work at refrigerated temperatures.





10:10 - Prof: "Cheese can be a high fat meal and that can take a long time to empty, as well as fibre."




10:08 - Nel presses witness on "Professor Simon said he was able to identify the food."




10:07 - "You haven't warned your patients not to have stir fry," says Nel, "and now you say it's important."




10:06 - No says prof, she slept, was premenopausal, could have delayed the emptying of her stomach.



10:04 - Nel says that Prof would expect Reeva's stomach to be empty, based on the time she had supper.




- DStv Premium, Extra, Compact and Compact Plus subscribers can keep up with The Oscar Trial on Channel 199



10:00 - Prof Lundgren insists that a minimum of six hours is recommended for gastric emptying.




9:57 - Nel to witness: "You don't know" on medication, illness that may have delayed gastric emptying.




9:55 - Nel to Prof: I'm not fighting with you, do you understand that?




9:54 - Nel objects to some evidence as "pure hearsay".




9:53 - Prof says that it is pure speculation to use gastric emptying as a measure.



9:52 - Reeva ate chicken between 19:00 and 21:00 on the day of her death, many factors may have delayed her gastric emptying.




9:51 - A number of drugs, including herbal medicines, cocaine, dagga, and even over-the-counter drugs delay gastric emptying.




9:49 - Sleep on the left side, smoking, premenopausal women can all have a delaying effect on gastric emptying.




9:48 - Gastric science "not an exact science" says prof.




9:46 - Content of the food key to stomach emptying.




9:46 - 10% of a low fat meal will remain in the stomach after four hours, but anaesthesiologists insist on six hours.




9:44 - SA medical guidelines liberal: Says patients can have clear fluids up to two hours before surgery, different with solid foods




9:43 - Gastric emptying takes a long time after patient has eaten says Prof, especially with a head injury



9:40 - Reeva Steenkamp stomach contents key to defence case.




9:37 - Prof goes through her qualifications, from 1977 to 2014, PhD in deaths due to anaesthesia.




9:34 - Court back in session witness sworn in, no pictures allowed




9:26 - Court is due to start in five minutes and defence likely to press the issue that Oscar screams in a high-pitched voice




9:23 - Oscar faces Day 28 in court - biggest issue in this case is whether it was premeditated




Subscribe to News24's latest videos here

Watch a full summary of day 27's court proceedings here:


Read more on:    gerrie nel  |  reeva steenkamp  |  oscar pistorius  |  barry roux  |  pistorius trial

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

SHARE:

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
100 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
PARTNER CONTENT
INFOGRAPHIC: New thinking required for retirement

Everything we believe about retirement is fast becoming outdated.

PARTNER CONTENT
WATCH: How education can change a life

A university education gives students the chance to create a better future for themselves, their families and to opportunity achieve their dreams.

/News
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.