Roux accuses State of avoiding 'damaging' witnesses

2014-08-07 16:22
(Alon Skuy, AP)

(Alon Skuy, AP)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Video

Oscar's trial - day 40 summary

2014-08-07 16:22

Here is everything you need to know about the State's closing argument. WATCH. WATCH

Pretoria - Lead defence attorney Barry Roux began his closing response in the murder trial of Oscar Pistorius by accusing the State of deliberately avoiding calling witnesses whose evidence would have damaged their case.

Roux will give the bulk of his wrap-up on Friday, which is expected to be the final day of a long-overrun trial.

The verdict hinges on whether Judge Thokozile Masipa believes Pistorius's version of events, and if she rejects his defence, she would only be able to consider the State's case, circumstantial evidence and the balance of probabilities.

Roux said the defence was not arguing that there was a conspiracy but that there was proof that officers disturbed the crime scene, citing a photo submitted as evidence that showed a policeman moving a bedroom plug.

Earlier State prosecutor Gerrie Nel asked Mapisa to reject the Paralympian’s defence as "devoid of any truth".

Double amputee Pistorius, once a national icon for reaching the pinnacle of sport, is accused of murdering his law graduate and model girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp at his home in Pretoria on Valentine's Day last year.

If found guilty of premeditated murder, he could face life in prison. A potential lesser charge of culpable homicide could carry a sentence of 15 years.

Since the trial opened in early March, Nel has portrayed Pistorius as a gun-obsessed hothead who shot 29-year-old Steenkamp four times through a locked toilet door where she was taking refuge after a heated argument.

The defence team says Pistorius, nicknamed the “blade runner” after his hi-tech prosthetics, was a vulnerable and caring boyfriend who killed Steenkamp by accident after mistaking her for an intruder hiding behind the door.

"The court should have no difficulty in rejecting his full version of events, not only as not reasonably possibly true, but in essence as being absolutely devoid of any truth," Nel told the Pretoria court during his closing arguments.

Nel, known as “The Pitbull” because of his fierce cross-examination style and penchant for the dramatic, said Pistorius was caught up in a "snowball of lies".

Conflicting versions

Nel spent the morning session trying to pick apart what he says is the contradictory evidence provided by Pistorius, 27, often shaking his head and holding his hands up in disbelief as he read from the athlete's testimony.

During his cross-examination, an emotional Pistorius said he had fired his gun accidentally without knowing what he was doing, straying from his original argument that he had shot knowingly because he thought his life was in danger.

Nel said Pistorius could not credibly assert that he had shot both deliberately and accidentally.

"The accused never said to anyone that got to the scene: 'It was an accident. The shot just went off'. He never said 'I didn't want to shoot'," said Nel.

"He said: 'I thought it was a burglar and I shot her. Sorry, I shot Reeva. I thought she was an intruder'," Nel said, reading from testimony taken by police after the shooting.

Roux's team has said that psychological evidence shows Pistorius has a 'heightened fight response' because of his disability and he would be more likely to confront danger than able-bodied people.

Nel referred to the part of his cross-examination of Pistorius where he analysed pictures of the couple's bedroom, which he said showed that the athlete's account of how he acted in the minutes before Steenkamp's death was impossible.

Pistorius says the police tampered with the evidence and moved items around the room, which Nel said was an "impossible conspiracy".

Crime scene

"The most devastating aspect of the accused's evidence is his inability and failure to contest the veracity of the scene's photographs... as to the condition of the scene prior to the commencement of any investigation," Nel said.

"Equally devastating is the vagueness of his version and the how and when the police would have tampered with the scene."

Another pivotal moment in the case was evidence given by witnesses who said they heard a woman scream prior to the sound of a volley of shots, supporting the prosecution's argument that the couple had an argument and Steenkamp feared for her life.

The defence says Pistorius sounds like a woman when he screams in distress and the witnesses did not hear shots after the shouts but the sound of Pistorius breaking down the door with a cricket bat after Steenkamp was already dead.

Pistorius also faces three separate charges, including two counts of discharging firearms in public and possession of illegal ammunition, all of which he denies.

The fathers of both Pistorius and Steenkamp were in court for the first time on Thursday. The runner, dressed in a dark suit and tie, sat impassively through most of the proceedings.

The killing has shattered the image of Pistorius as an embodiment of triumph over adversity for both his Paralympic victories and his success against able-bodied athletes at the 2012 London Olympics.

The athlete broke down frequently during the trial, often sobbing and vomiting into a bucket.

The closing arguments were expected to last two days, after which judge Masipa, who has more than 4 000 pages of evidence to review, will retire to consider her verdict.

Masipa was only the second black woman to be appointed a high court judge and has a reputation for handing down stiff sentences in crimes against women.

Read more on:    gerrie nel  |  oscar pistorius  |  barry roux  |  crime  |  pistorius trial

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

SHARE:

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
32 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
PARTNER CONTENT
INFOGRAPHIC: New thinking required for retirement

Everything we believe about retirement is fast becoming outdated.

PARTNER CONTENT
WATCH: How education can change a life

A university education gives students the chance to create a better future for themselves, their families and to opportunity achieve their dreams.

/News
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.