Definition of security not needed - ANC

2011-08-15 22:25
Cape Town - The ANC's reluctance to define two key concepts in the protection of information bill led on Monday to fresh cries of unconstitutionality and calls for it to be binned.

Luwellyn Landers, the MP leading deliberations on the bill for the ruling party, proposed that lawmakers not seek to define national security - set out in the bill as the sole basis for any decision to classify information - and leave it up to courts and intelligence operatives to interpret the concept.

He argued there was little international precedent for a definition and that the meaning of national security differed from country to country.

"Virtually nowhere in democratic dispensations such as ours have governments defined it. National security defies clear definition. It has malleable and very elastic meanings."

Landers added: "Judges know what it means. They don't need a definition. Intelligence operatives know what national security means. You don't need a definition - you are speaking to the converted."

But opposition MPs believe that, in the words of the Democratic Alliance's Dene Smuts, if left undefined the term "can mean any damn thing" and the current draft would sail dangerously close to earlier ones that sought to allow classification to protect not only national security but the still more elusive notion of national interest.

That provoked sustained protest and was eventually cut from the bill at the orders of the state security ministry.


Her colleague David Maynier said Canadian law did have a definition and proposed that South Africa borrow from it to write into the bill that national security did not preclude legitimate political activity, advocacy, protest and dissent. "We need a clear and narrow definition because it must be clear to classifiers what may and may not be classified."

Maynier warned that if this were not done, "there may again be a problem of constitutionality".

The remark offended Landers, who pointed out that the ANC when it promised a host of concessions on the bill in June, agreed to limit the power to classify information to the intelligence agencies.

This meant that only six or seven bodies would have the power to classify information and their members had a clear grasp of what should be kept secret because it could put at risk the national security.

"I don't agree with you that if we don't define national security the bill is unconstitutional," he said.

Back to the drawing board

Landers earlier resisted opposition demands that "prejudice to the republic" be defined clearly in the bill.

Clause 42 of the draft act makes it a crime punishable with up to 20 years in prison to obtain top secret information that could "benefit a non-state actor engaged in hostile activity or prejudice the republic".

Smuts said the notion of prejudice was far too wide and could allow the clause to be abused to silence the media, one of the main criticisms of the contentious bill.

Ideally, she said, the vague notion of prejudice should be removed, leaving the clause to target only those who traffic secrets to organisations like al-Qaeda.

Landers was adamant that the clause should remain and state law advisers said they were satisfied that it posed no problem.

The Right 2 Know Campaign accused the ANC of failing to let go of its initial, regressive agenda with the bill.

Spokesperson Murray Hunter said slow, obtuse deliberations among lawmakers in recent weeks had convinced him that they could not deliver workable legislation by Parliament's deadline of September 23.

"I am increasingly of a mind that it should be scrapped in its entirety and another independent body should go to the drawing board and start again."

Legal experts Iain Currie and Pierre de Vos have also said in the past they did not believe the law could be wrested away from its beginnings and turned into a conventional state secrets act by making changes here and there.
Read more on:    da  |  anc  |  dene smuts  |  david maynier  |  luwellyn landers  |  security  |  info bill

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24


Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.