Judge dismisses Parliament feed application

2015-03-10 13:28
Journalists attending the State of the Nation address hold their phones in the air to protest against the jammed signal in the House. (Lerato Maduna, City Press)

Journalists attending the State of the Nation address hold their phones in the air to protest against the jammed signal in the House. (Lerato Maduna, City Press)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Cape Town - The Western Cape High Court on Tuesday dismissed an urgent interim application for an order enforcing uninterrupted audio and a wide-angle shot of the National Assembly chamber during disruptions.

Judge Owen Rogers delivered the order within a few minutes, announcing that interim relief against Parliament would not be granted and that the application for final relief would be heard on 20 April.

Media24, Primedia Broadcasting, the SA National Editors' Forum, and others had argued that a suspension of one part of Parliament's broadcasting policy was urgent because further disruption in Parliament was likely in the coming weeks.

Constitutional right

Steven Budlender, for the applicants, argued last week that it was the constitutional right of every citizen to have an accurate representation of what occurred in the House.

Jeremy Gauntlett, for Parliament, argued that not everything the public found interesting was in the public interest. Parliament also had a right to regulate its activities and preserve its dignity.

At present, the policy gives the parliamentary broadcasting director the discretion to use occasional wide-angle shots during unparliamentary behaviour.

There is no provision for such a shot during a grave disturbance and the policy does not define what such a disturbance entails.

During President Jacob Zuma's State of the Nation address in Parliament on 12 February, the eviction of Economic Freedom Fighters MPs from the House was not broadcast.

Instead the camera focused on Speaker Baleka Mbete and National Council of Provinces chairperson Thandi Modise.

Signal jamming

Before this happened, journalists and some MPs protested against cellphone signals being blocked in the House.

As a result of undertakings by Parliament, the applicants did not ask for interim relief to ensure there was no jamming of signal during sittings or meetings. However, they were asking for final relief regarding signal jamming.

Rogers, with Judges Elizabeth Baartman and Nape Dolamo, ruled that overall interim relief was not necessary because there was an absence of irreparable harm and the balance of convenience did not favour the applicants.

The five minutes of restricted feed during disruptions did not weigh up to the five years that the broadcasting policy and measures had been in place.

The media was not restricted from reporting on proceedings and any future disruptions in the House in the interim.

"The applicants could have approached the court sooner; nevertheless, we are persuaded that the matter warrants an expedited hearing, being sufficiently urgent and involving constitutional issues of national importance," the judgment reads.

Final relief

In the final relief, the applicants wanted any temporary order on the audio and wide-angle shot to be made final.

The applicants wanted the court to declare that the manner in which audio and visual feeds were produced on 12 February was unconstitutional and unlawful.

They wanted the court to find invalid the section on grave disturbances and unparliamentary behaviour in Parliament's filming and broadcasting policy.

An order forcing Mbete, Modise, and Secretary to Parliament Gengezi Mgidlana to investigate who was responsible for the signal jamming is also being sought.

The outcome of the probe should be submitted to the court.

In the judgment on Tuesday, the judges said it would be premature to pronounce on the constitutionality of the policy's provisions.

Each party was ordered to pay its own costs in light of the constitutional issues at hand.

Read more on:    primedia  |  sanef  |  media24  |  cape town  |  state of the nation 2015  |  parliament 2015  |  media

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
72 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
PARTNER CONTENT
INFOGRAPHIC: New thinking required for retirement

Everything we believe about retirement is fast becoming outdated.

PARTNER CONTENT
WATCH: How education can change a life

A university education gives students the chance to create a better future for themselves, their families and to opportunity achieve their dreams.

/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
Traffic
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.