News24

Opposition pushes for narrowing of info bill

2011-04-11 22:16

Cape Town - Political opposition parties have tabled submissions calling for the scope of the protection of information bill to be whittled down after progress on the legislation appeared to stall in recent months.

The Democratic Alliance called in its document for the scrapping of entire chapters of the bill, which is widely seen as a regressive bid to prevent scrutiny and criticism of the state.

This includes chapter two which provides for the classification of so-called valuable information to prevent it from getting lost and destroyed.

DA MP Dene Smuts said valuable information had no place in the bill and using intelligence agents as "the filing clerks of the nation" to safeguard it would simply perpetuate the misguided practices of the Minimum Information Security System (Miss), the post-apartheid guidelines on classifying information.

Instead, she said, the only business of the bill should be the protection of intelligence, international relations and technological secrets.

Smuts said as it stands, the bill seeks to entrench the Miss in law by stipulating that its application be underpinned by regulations replicating the system's guidelines, allowing the intelligence services to continue exercising control over information in state departments.

A major concern for all opposition parties is a definition in the current draft of the bill that gives the heads of all organs of state the power to classify information.

Full scope

According to the Institute for Democracy in Africa (Idasa) there are 1 001 bodies that would have the right to file information as secret under the proposed law, which prescribes minimum prison sentences for all who leak classified information.

The list it gave the ad hoc committee drafting the bill includes all universities, state-owned corporations such as Eskom, the South African Weather Service, the Johannesburg zoo and the Voortrekker Museum.

Idasa has warned committee chairperson Cecil Burgess that Parliament should not seek to pass legislation without realising its full scope.

The African Christian Democratic Party submitted that the definition of organs of state be narrowed down, along with that of national security as a cause for classification.

"These amendments together with the insertion of a public interest defence would make the information bill constitutionally more defensible," ACDP MP Steve Swart said.

Swart pointed out that the Protection of Access to Information Act (PAIA) already allows for the disclosure of information on defence, security and foreign relations if it is in the public interest.

Inkatha Freedom Party MP Mario Oriani-Ambrosini called for the bill to be harmonised with PAIA and for a clause to be inserted stating that information can be classified only if its release objectively posed a clear and present threat to national security.

He said the opposition feared that the ANC would at the end of the day ignore a wealth of submissions from the opposition, media and rights activists criticising the bill and submit it to Parliament for approval in a still repressive form.

The calls for narrower definitions and a public interest defence clause to protect journalists have repeatedly been made in the committee in recent months but failed to find agreement with the ANC members.

This has left opposition MPs to feel the drafting process is in deadlock as the committee's June 24 deadline for finalising the bill and reporting to the National Assembly looms.


Comments
  • edvermaak - 2011-04-11 22:45

    Stuff any protection of information. We are the electorate and we put you leaders there to govern us - what information would you possibly want to hide from us unless it is to manipulate or deceive us? The electorate should have every reasonable manner in which to participate in the overall decision making process and can only do this with all the information necessary to do so.

      Thangy - 2011-04-12 11:01

      What are they trying to hide??

      Thangy - 2011-04-12 11:02

      What are they trying to hide??

      Thangy - 2011-04-12 11:02

      What are they trying to hide??

  • saliem - 2011-04-11 22:55

    Ultimately this will be in the hands of the Con Court to decide :-)

  • Badballie - 2011-04-12 07:12

    as long as there are patriots and wikileak type site, this information will find its way to the public irrespective of what the law says. It is every citizens duty to ensure that government is brought to book for its transgressions.

  • Zion - 2011-04-12 10:53

    Do I get the feeling that the world is getting smaller, country's borders are opening and drifting closer due to tectonic movement and government stasis. When a government becomes unstable, like ours, it tends to prop up their power via laws of different kinds to support the crumbling edifice. A look back in history will indicate it has been done by most states suffering from the cancer of communism and the terminal ills of dictatorships. The very first law to be manipulated is the control of information and mobility of the population. The defunct Soviet Union was a master of suppression of information even to the extent that it affected the Church. Stated in a more technical manner: It would be seen that the emergence of manipulating public information is a property of a state sliding into a state of chaos. History will show us that the Soviet Union was on that slide since its inception. And Cuba while the Chinese saw the abyss ahead.

  • Madelane - 2011-04-12 12:50

    The sooner the press is muzzled the sooner crime, corruption, nepostism, AA and all other evil will cease. Ask the ANC as they learnt this little fact from the NATS.

  • pages:
  • 1