NY judge rules NSA phone surveillance is legal

2013-12-28 08:07

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

New York - A federal judge on Friday found that the National Security Agency's bulk collection of millions of Americans' telephone records is legal and a valuable part of the nation's arsenal to counter the threat of terrorism.

The decision contrasts with a ruling earlier this month by another US District Court judge, Richard Leon, who granted a preliminary injunction against the collecting of phone records of two men who had challenged the programme.

Leon said the programme likely violates the Constitution's ban on unreasonable search.

On Friday, US District Judge William Pauley said in a written opinion that the programme "represents the government's counter-punch" to eliminate al-Qaeda's terror network by connecting fragmented and fleeting communications.

In his ruling, the judge noted the 11 September 2011 terrorist attacks and how the phone data-collection system could have helped investigators connect information before the attacks occurred.

"The government learned from its mistake and adapted to confront a new enemy: a terror network capable of orchestrating attacks across the world. It launched a number of counter-measures, including a bulk telephony metadata collection programme - a wide net that could find and isolate gossamer contacts among suspected terrorists in an ocean of seemingly disconnected data," he said.

Pauley dismissed a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union. The rights group did not immediately respond to a message for comment.

"We are pleased with the decision," Justice Department spokesperson Peter Carr said.

The ACLU sued earlier this year after former NSA analyst Edward Snowden leaked details of the secret programmes that critics say violate privacy rights. The NSA-run programmes pick up millions of telephone and Internet records that are routed through American networks each day.

An ACLU lawyer had argued that the government's interpretation of its authority under the Patriot Act was so broad that it could justify the mass collection of financial, health and even library records of innocent Americans without their knowledge.

A government lawyer had countered that counterterrorism investigators wouldn't find most personal information useful.

Read more on:    nsa  |  edward snowden  |  us  |  online privacy

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
14 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.