Bush 'wins Iraq showdown'
2007-05-23 07:28
Washington - Anti-war Democrats on Tuesday shelved their crusade to condition Iraq war funding on troop withdrawals, but denied handing President George W Bush a multi-billion dollar victory.
Instead of homecoming soldiers, party leaders reluctantly accepted the first congressionally approved political and security benchmarks for the Iraqi government, a plan ridiculed just last week by a top Democrat as "weak".
They vowed to renew their battle to end US involvement in the war through defence bills looming in the next few months and claimed their weeks-long constitutional showdown had boxed Bush in as never before.
House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi presented the outline of the new funding bill, worth around $100bn, to her restive party caucus on Tuesday, billing it as "another stage in the sequencing of ending this war".
Pelosi said September was now the real "moment of truth for this war" as several spending bills come up as well as a report on the progress of Bush's troop surge strategy by top war general, David Petraeus.
Some top Republicans have already said they will either need to see progress by then, or sweeping changes in US strategy in the war, which has killed more than 3 400 US soldiers.
Bush has vowed never to accept timelines for withdrawal, billed by Republicans as "surrender dates" and vetoed a previous $124bn spending bill because it included such mechanisms.
Democrats lack sufficient votes
Though Democrats control both chambers of Congress, they lack sufficient votes to override a presidential veto.
The House was to vote, probably on Thursday, on a war funding package and companion legislation containing extra domestic spending and including hurricane relief funding and other spending hikes, included to placate liberal Democrats.
The Senate would then be asked to vote on the package as a whole, said Democratic representative David Obey, who has been locked in talks with Republicans, top senators and the White House on the funding package.
Democrats dismissed the notion that their reluctant dropping of withdrawal timelines handed Bush a hard-won victory.
"I don't think there's any way you could stretch, saying whatever we decide to do in this legislation is a defeat," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said.
"For heaven's sakes, look where we've come. We have come a long, long ways."
Leaders said the budget language would mirror a Republican-backed amendment passed last week and accepted by the White House, which would require Bush to report to Congress on progress in Iraq in July and September.
'Toothless benchmarks'
The bill, framed by Republican Senator John Warner, also raises the prospect of the Iraqi government forfeiting non-military financial aid if it fails to reach a set of political and security benchmarks.
Though Reid ridiculed the bill last week as "weak", he said on Tuesday it would mark an an important step toward ending the war.
"If that's all there is, it's a lot more than the president ever expected he'd have to agree to."
Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell meanwhile said the chamber appeared ready to pass a bill "without a surrender date".
But there was immediate anger from the anti-war wing of the Democratic Party.
"I cannot support a bill that contains nothing more than toothless benchmarks and that allows the president to continue what may be the greatest foreign policy blunder in our nation's history," said Democratic Senator Russ Feingold.
Democratic leaders upped the ante in talks with the White House on Friday, again insisting on the need for a date for troop withdrawals to begin - though offering Bush the power to waive the requirement.
But all along, they said they would get a bill funding the troops until the end of September, to the president's desk before leaving on a week-long recess on Friday.