News24

Breivik: Jail pathetic, wants death

2012-04-18 22:49

Oslo - Norway's prison terms are "pathetic," confessed mass killer Anders Behring Breivik declared on Wednesday in court, claiming the death penalty or a full acquittal were the "only logical outcomes" for his massacre of 77 people.

The right-wing fanatic said he doesn't fear death and that militant nationalists in Europe have a lot to learn from al-Qaeda, including their methods and glorification of martyrdom.

"If I had feared death I would not have dared to carry out this operation," he said, referring to his July 22 attacks - a bombing in downtown Oslo that killed eight and a shooting massacre at a youth camp outside the Norwegian capital that killed 69 people.

Breivik's comments came as he was pressed to give details on the anti-Muslim militant group he claims to belong to but which prosecutors say doesn't exist as he describes. Several unrelated groups claim part of that "Knights Templar" name.

The 33-year-old Norwegian acknowledged that his supposed crusader network is "not an organisation in a conventional sense" but insisted that it is for real.

"It is not in my interest to shed light on details that could lead to arrests," he said refusing to comment on the group's alleged other members.

The issue is of key importance in determining Breivik's sanity, and whether he's sent to prison or compulsory psychiatric care for the bomb-and-shooting massacre that shocked Norway.

If found sane, Breivik could face a maximum 21-year prison sentence or an alternate custody arrangement that would keep him locked up as long as he is considered a menace to society. If declared insane he would be committed to psychiatric care for as long as he's considered ill.

"I view 21 years in prison as a pathetic sentence," Breivik said. Asked by the prosecutor if he would rather have received a death penalty - which does not exist in current Norwegian law.

Only two outcomes

"I don't wish for it but I would have respected that decision," he said. "There are only two outcomes in this case that I had respected, that that is the death penalty or acquittal."

Breivik claims to have carried out the attacks on behalf of the "Knights Templar," which he described in the 1 500-page compendium he posted online before the attacks as a militant nationalist group fighting a Muslim colonisation of Europe.

Breivik said it exists but police just hadn't done a good enough job in uncovering it. The group consists of "independent cells," he added, "and therefore in the long term will be a leaderless organisation".

Prosecutor Inga Bejer Engh pressed him about details on the group, its members and its meetings. Breivik claimed to have met a Serb "war hero" living in exile during a trip to Liberia in 2002, but he refused to identify him.

"What is it you're getting at?" Breivik told the prosecutor, then answered the question himself, saying prosecutors want to "sow doubt over whether the KT network exists".

The main point of his defence is to avoid an insanity ruling, which would deflate his political arguments. One official psychiatric evaluation found him psychotic and "delusional," while another found him mentally competent to be sent to prison.

Breivik also refused to give details on what he claims was the founding session of the "Knights Templar" in London in 2002. He conceded, however, that he embellished somewhat in the manifesto when he described members at the founding session as "brilliant political and military tacticians of Europe".

Breivik testified that he had used "pompous" language and described them instead as "people with great integrity".

Bejer Engh challenged him on whether the meeting had taken place at all.

Glorification

"Yes, there was a meeting in London," Breivik insisted.

"It's not something you have made up?" Engh countered.

"I haven't made up anything. What is in the compendium is correct," he said.

Later, he answered with more nuance.

"There is nothing that is made up, but you have to see what is written in a context. It is a glorification of certain ideals," Breivik said.

Breivik's defensive answers contrasted with the assertive posture he took on Tuesday when he read a prepared statement to the court, boasting that he had carried out the most "spectacular" attack by a nationalist militant since World War II.

His stance has angered victim support groups.

"I think what we are watching is the revelation of a sort of fantasy or a dream," said Christin Bjelland, deputy head of a support group for survivors of the July 22 massacre.

Breivik admits he set off a bomb outside the government headquarters in Oslo, killing eight, then drove to Utoya island outside the capital and massacred 69 people in a shooting spree at the governing Labor Party's youth summer camp.

He said his victims - mostly teenagers - were not innocent but legitimate targets because they were representatives of a "multiculturalist" regime he claims is deconstructing Norway's national identity by allowing immigration.


Comments
  • Bigsexy.jm - 2012-04-19 07:27

    21 years for the murder of 77 innocents?! You must be kidding me! Lock him in the darkest dungeon possible for life!

      clinton.badenhorst - 2012-04-19 08:56

      I am thinking the same thing! 21 years??? I thought the SA justice system was cr@p, but hell... Norway takes the cake! How can you let a psycho like that out after 21 years? What will stop him to kill another 77? His jail sentence could also be lightened for good behaviour etc. Meaning he could be free in 15 years maybe? What a sick world we live in!

      Andreas - 2012-04-21 20:58

      I doubt that all of the 77 were that innocent. They were members of the Norwegian Labour Party or children of prominent members of them. That party sold out the vital interest of the Norwegian people in the name of multiculturalism. And yes, the Norwegian Labour Party together with the Norwegian churches did support terrorism in South Africa via giving money to the ANC, PAC and other criminal organisations. At least Breivik has the decency to state that the death penalty is suitable for him.

  • Keba - 2012-04-19 09:14

    You've got to give it to the human race for excelling at destroying itself.\r\n\r\nAnd it's for the usual reasons: money, power and religion.

  • Keba - 2012-04-19 09:14

    You've got to give it to the human race for excelling at destroying itself.\r\n\r\nAnd it's for the usual reasons: money, power and religion.

  • Ask - 2012-04-19 11:40

    It was what they call 'legitimate defence', if the killer in Norway was a Muslim; he may have got 42 years to life... because he was a Christian Knight Templar... it is only 21 years... this is irrespective of the number of people that was murdered... Now you should see the Scandinavian prisons... it is like a 5 star hotel... google it... what a jol...

      Andreas - 2012-04-21 21:10

      The opposite is true. If he'd be a muslim the do-gooders would plead for "tolerance". Let's imagine he'd be a Black South African. He'd fight for some phoney reason to get access to the resources Whites built for themselves.

  • pages:
  • 1