News24

Iran eyes talks after nuclear boasts

2012-02-16 16:53

Tehran - Iran on Thursday expressed hopes of reviving moribund talks with world powers, a day after the Islamic republic unveiled what it described as major progress in its controversial nuclear programme.

"We have always welcomed the principle of negotiations and we believe that, with a positive approach and spirit of co-operation, there can be a step forward in these negotiations," foreign ministry spokesperson Ramin Mehmanparast was quoted as saying by the Fars news agency.

Iran on Wednesday sent a letter confirming its readiness to discuss resuming negotiations in response to an October 2011 offer in that sense made by EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton.

The last round of talks between Iran and the so-called P5+1 group - UN Security Council permanent members Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States, plus Germany - collapsed in Turkey in January 2011.

Iran's tardy reply to Ashton appeared to be linked to the timing of its nuclear announcements also made on Wednesday, which collectively suggested the country had made strides in its atomic activities despite severe Western and UN sanctions.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, wearing a white coat, oversaw what was described on state television as the insertion of Iran's first domestically produced, 20% enriched fuel plate into Tehran's research reactor.

Iranian progress

He and other officials also said Iran had added 3 000 more centrifuges to its uranium enrichment efforts and was stepping up exploration and processing of uranium yellowcake.

The declarations were meant to underline Iran's progress in mastering all aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle and underline its commitment to what it said was a purely peaceful atomic programme for energy generation and medical use.

They also underlined the Islamic republic's determination to push on with nuclear activities despite US and EU sanctions aimed at throttling its economy, especially its all-important oil exports - and despite speculation Israel or the United States could launch air strikes against its nuclear facilities.

The state newspaper IRAN said the reactor fuel plate advance gave Iran "the upper hand" in its future negotiations with the P5+1.

But Washington, which fears Iran is trying to develop atomic weapons, was quick to dismiss Wednesday's announcements as "hyped" and "not big news".

The Iranians have for months been boasting of progress, State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland said, but they are in fact "many, many months behind" their own calendars.

Point of no return

Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak told Israeli state radio in a telephone interview from Tokyo that the Iranians were "boasting of successes they have not achieved", even though he admitted they "are continuing to progress" in the nuclear field.

"The Iranians want to give the impression they are more advanced to create the impression they have passed the 'point of no return', which is not true," he said.

Tensions between the two arch-foes rose significantly this week after a series of bomb incidents in India, Thailand and Georgia targeting Israeli diplomats. Israel blamed them on Tehran, which denied any involvement.

Russia, which thus far has protected Iran against Western diplomatic efforts to broaden sanctions, has also noted the developments Islamic republic's nuclear activities.

"The Iranian side is indeed making progress in its nuclear programme," Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov told the specialised journal Security Index.

Ryabkov urged talks take place, with real concessions for the Iranians, otherwise the nuclear risks would increase.

Computer simulations


"We are concerned that the distance that separates Iran from the hypothetical possession of technologies to create nuclear weapons is contracting," he said.

Suggestions that Iran was engaged in research and computer simulations to make nuclear warheads and fit them to its ballistic missiles formed the thrust of a November report by the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency.

A high-level IAEA delegation visited Tehran late last month to discuss the concerns. But one diplomat at IAEA headquarters in Vienna said afterwards that the Iranians "quite cleverly stonewalled for three days".

The delegation is due to return to Tehran next Monday. The outcome of those discussions could be key in determining the path towards wider talks between Iran and the P5+1.

Comments
  • lindz.kok - 2012-02-16 20:50

    sneaky sneaky islam!!!

  • allcoveredinNinjas - 2012-02-17 09:19

    Same S#it as the others , provocation and then the needled olive branch.

      Fidel - 2012-02-17 09:32

      Who did Iran provoke?

      allcoveredinNinjas - 2012-02-17 11:51

      Is it not a provacative move to go on State TV and dramatically hype the nuclear rod insertion and announce further enrichment plans(A major point of contention) amid growing concerns from the international community ?

      Fred - 2012-02-18 06:34

      Threatened to close the Straights of Hormuz, all the while not really intending to do it. Childish games.

      Fidel - 2012-02-18 07:05

      The whole notion that there exists an international community that has the interests of global human rights at its heart is naive at best and cynical rhetoric at worst, and international community being a euphemism for the US and Western Europe. "President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, wearing a white coat, oversaw what was described on state television as the insertion of Iran's first domestically produced, 20% enriched fuel plate into Tehran's research reactor." Whether this is true or not is besides the point. Iran as a signatory to the NPT is allowed to enrich uranium to around a 20% level, which is considered not enough to develop a weapon. Is Israel the only country allowed to make provocative statements on intl television in the region.

      Fred - 2012-02-20 05:18

      Your belief and world view is clearly cynical and negative. This is consistent with a pseudo-victim belief system. There very much exists a community of nations that has the interests of global human rights at heart. That you overlook the Iranian regime's plainly stated threats to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth and its ongoing denials that the Holocaust happened is consistent with your one-eyed and faulty world view.

  • pages:
  • 1