News24

Judge - no ID needed for vote

2012-10-02 22:28

Harrisburg - One of the toughest of a new wave of US state laws in a debate over voting rights was put on hold on Tuesday as a judge postponed Pennsylvania's voter identification requirement just weeks before the presidential election.

The 6-month-old law in one of the most prized states in the November election has become a high-profile issue in the tight contest between President Barack Obama and Republican nominee Mitt Romney.

Independent polls show a persistent lead for Obama in the state, but pollsters have said the requirement for voters to show a valid ID could mean that fewer people, especially the poor and minorities, end up voting. In the past, lower turnouts in Pennsylvania have benefited Republicans.

A top state lawmaker boasted to a Republican dinner in June that the ID requirement "is going to allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania." Publicly, Republicans have justified the law as a protection against potential election fraud.

The law had faced protests, warnings of Election Day chaos and voter education drives as the law's opponents - including minorities, older people and labour unions - began collecting stories of people who had no valid photo ID and faced stiff barriers in their efforts to get one.

The judge's decision on Tuesday could be appealed to the state Supreme Court, but it could easily be the final word on the law before the 6 November election. The ruling also allows the law to go into full effect next year.

Democrats have used opposition to the law as a rallying cry to motivate volunteers and campaign contributions. They accused Republicans of trying to steal the White House from Obama by making it harder for young adults, the poor, minorities and the disabled to vote.

In a statement, the Obama campaign said the decision means that "eligible voters can vote on Election Day, just like they have in previous elections in the state".

The state's Republican Party chair, Rob Gleason, said he was disappointed.

One person, one vote

"Despite the empty rhetoric to the contrary, this legislation is still about ensuring one person, one vote," Gleason said.

The plaintiffs - a group of registered voters, plus the Homeless Advocacy Project, the League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People - had sought to block the law from taking effect in this year's election as part of a wider challenge to its constitutionality.

The constitutionality of the law, however, was not a question before the judge, who was under orders from a higher court to postpone the law if he thought anyone eligible would be unable to cast a ballot because of it.

Election workers will still be allowed to ask voters for a valid photo ID, but people without it can vote on a regular voting machine and will not have to cast a provisional ballot or prove their identity to election officials after the election.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs called the judge's decision a "win," but they said they would ask the state to end or change a multimillion-dollar ad campaign about the voter ID requirement to reflect the judge's ruling.

"Otherwise there is a possibility of confusion by voters, and folks without ID may just stay home because they wrongly believe they need ID," said Witold J Walczak of the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania. "It could create confusion among poll workers, and any time you have confusion on Election Day, it's not good for democracy."

Other states face similar debates over voting.

The US Supreme Court upheld Indiana's voter ID law in 2008, and Georgia's top court upheld that state's voter ID law. But a federal panel struck down Texas' voter ID law, and the state court in Wisconsin has blocked its voter ID laws for now.

The Justice Department cleared New Hampshire's voter ID law earlier this year.

Comments
  • anton.d.beer - 2012-10-03 05:10

    Crazy!!

  • Mark - 2012-10-03 07:04

    In South Africa, well before the 1994 elections and subsequent elections, there has always been a drive to make sure that eligible voters had a valid green ID book. Why do they not do the same in the USA. It's not very democratic to spring this photo id requirement on voters at the last minute especially when it has not been required before.

      kevin.watson.7906 - 2012-10-03 08:55

      As with South Africa the difficulty is that many of the poorer people haven't got birth certificates and so cannot get valid ID's. many of them are older people born before 1960 when discrimination illiteracy and poverty prevented them from registering births, much as in South Africa. In this country this has been circumvented by rural peolpe bringing a signed form letter from the Chief or and so getting an ID. In South Africa this has lead to fraud as many of my Ndebele countrymen from Zimbabwe have obtained ID's in this way. You are perhaps a little naive.

  • DSBennie - 2012-10-03 07:34

    In what world is it against your rights to have to prove who you are before you vote????

      kevin.watson.7906 - 2012-10-03 08:57

      In most of the Western world identity fraud has only become an issue recently as there is no great fight for scarce jobs and resources. No one in Britain carries an ID or has one.

  • mike.clery - 2012-10-03 07:57

    So how do they know that only US citizens are voting?

  • PrettyUsefulArt - 2012-10-03 08:56

    OMG - Let's hope Malema doesn't hear about this!!!

  • pages:
  • 1