Judge - no ID needed for vote

2012-10-02 22:28
Signs tell of the requirement for voters to show an acceptable photo ID to vote at the the Penndot Drivers Licence Centre in Butler, Pennsylvania. (Keith Srakocic, AP/File)

Signs tell of the requirement for voters to show an acceptable photo ID to vote at the the Penndot Drivers Licence Centre in Butler, Pennsylvania. (Keith Srakocic, AP/File)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories


106 years old and voting Obama

2012-10-02 08:52

The last time Margaret Harris voted was in 1928. Watch this video to find out why she is voting Obama. WATCH

Harrisburg - One of the toughest of a new wave of US state laws in a debate over voting rights was put on hold on Tuesday as a judge postponed Pennsylvania's voter identification requirement just weeks before the presidential election.

The 6-month-old law in one of the most prized states in the November election has become a high-profile issue in the tight contest between President Barack Obama and Republican nominee Mitt Romney.

Independent polls show a persistent lead for Obama in the state, but pollsters have said the requirement for voters to show a valid ID could mean that fewer people, especially the poor and minorities, end up voting. In the past, lower turnouts in Pennsylvania have benefited Republicans.

A top state lawmaker boasted to a Republican dinner in June that the ID requirement "is going to allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania." Publicly, Republicans have justified the law as a protection against potential election fraud.

The law had faced protests, warnings of Election Day chaos and voter education drives as the law's opponents - including minorities, older people and labour unions - began collecting stories of people who had no valid photo ID and faced stiff barriers in their efforts to get one.

The judge's decision on Tuesday could be appealed to the state Supreme Court, but it could easily be the final word on the law before the 6 November election. The ruling also allows the law to go into full effect next year.

Democrats have used opposition to the law as a rallying cry to motivate volunteers and campaign contributions. They accused Republicans of trying to steal the White House from Obama by making it harder for young adults, the poor, minorities and the disabled to vote.

In a statement, the Obama campaign said the decision means that "eligible voters can vote on Election Day, just like they have in previous elections in the state".

The state's Republican Party chair, Rob Gleason, said he was disappointed.

One person, one vote

"Despite the empty rhetoric to the contrary, this legislation is still about ensuring one person, one vote," Gleason said.

The plaintiffs - a group of registered voters, plus the Homeless Advocacy Project, the League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People - had sought to block the law from taking effect in this year's election as part of a wider challenge to its constitutionality.

The constitutionality of the law, however, was not a question before the judge, who was under orders from a higher court to postpone the law if he thought anyone eligible would be unable to cast a ballot because of it.

Election workers will still be allowed to ask voters for a valid photo ID, but people without it can vote on a regular voting machine and will not have to cast a provisional ballot or prove their identity to election officials after the election.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs called the judge's decision a "win," but they said they would ask the state to end or change a multimillion-dollar ad campaign about the voter ID requirement to reflect the judge's ruling.

"Otherwise there is a possibility of confusion by voters, and folks without ID may just stay home because they wrongly believe they need ID," said Witold J Walczak of the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania. "It could create confusion among poll workers, and any time you have confusion on Election Day, it's not good for democracy."

Other states face similar debates over voting.

The US Supreme Court upheld Indiana's voter ID law in 2008, and Georgia's top court upheld that state's voter ID law. But a federal panel struck down Texas' voter ID law, and the state court in Wisconsin has blocked its voter ID laws for now.

The Justice Department cleared New Hampshire's voter ID law earlier this year.

Read more on:    us  |  us elections 2012

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.