Julian Assange in UK Supreme Court

2012-02-01 16:49
Julian Assange, the 40-year-old WikiLeaks founder, arrives at the Supreme Court in London. (Kirsty Wigglesworth, AP)

Julian Assange, the 40-year-old WikiLeaks founder, arrives at the Supreme Court in London. (Kirsty Wigglesworth, AP)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

London - Julian Assange took his extradition battle to Britain's Supreme Court on Wednesday, arguing that sending him to Sweden would violate a fundamental principle of natural law.

The two-day hearing is Assange's last chance to persuade British judges to quash efforts to send him to Scandinavia, where he is wanted on sex crimes allegations.

The case hinges on a single technical point: Whether Sweden's public prosecutor can properly issue a warrant for Assange's arrest.

In Britain as in the United States, generally only judges can issue arrest warrants, and British courts only honour warrants issued by what they describe as judicial authorities.

Lawyers for Sweden argue that, in Sweden as in other European countries, prosecutors play a judicial or semi-judicial role.

Assange lawyer Dinah Rose rejected that argument on Wednesday, telling the seven justices gathered in Britain's highest court that a prosecutor "does not, and indeed cannot as a matter of principle, exercise judicial authority".

Independence and impartiality

She said that wasn't just a parochial British view, but rather a "fundamental principle" that stretches back 1 500 years to the Codex Justinius, the Byzantine legal code.

"No one may be a judge in their own case," Rose said.

Rose spent the first 2 1/2 hours of the hearing combing through British case law and parsing European draft treaties to buttress her case - in some cases slipping into French to make finer points and wording.

She claimed that those who set the rules for European extraditions expected that judicial authorities issuing warrants would be independent and impartial, noting that drafters dropped the reference to public prosecutors from the final version of their text.

Evidence showed, she said, that drafters believed "that the European arrest warrant was a very serious measure that has to be issued by a court".

She spoke confidently and with few interruptions, but legal experts say Rose faces an uphill battle to convince the Supreme Court to block the extradition.

Vigil for Julian

Karen Todner, a prominent extradition specialist, said before the case started that Assange's lawyers were unlikely to overcome the benefit of the doubt usually afforded to other European countries' judicial systems.

British judges "absolutely defer" to their European counterparts' justice systems, she said, adding that she would be "very surprised" if Assange's team won the day.

Just over a dozen sympathisers came to support Assange, a 40-year-old Australian, outside the Supreme Court building on Wednesday.

"We're here to show solidarity and hold a vigil for Julian Assange," said Andrew Russell, 31. "He was able to show the world, open that window for a brief time into what's really going on. I see him as a journalist who should be rewarded for that courageous work, rather than hounded."

The UK justices, who have dispensed with formal court attire in favour of business suits, will hear lawyers for the prosecution on Thursday. Their decision isn't expected for several weeks.

No bail in Sweden

If they rule against Assange, the 40-year-old Australian is expected to be on a flight to Sweden within two weeks. Assange could conceivably appeal to the European Court of Human Rights, but because Sweden is a fellow European country that would not stop his extradition.

Once in Sweden he would be arrested and a detention hearing would be held within four days. Prosecutors could decide to release him after questioning, but the court could also extend his period of detention.

Such hearings must be held every two weeks until a suspect is charged or released. There is no bail in Sweden.

It's still not clear whether charges will be brought against him in Sweden. If Assange is convicted, the penalties for the types of crime he's accused of range from fines to as much as six years in prison.

Read more on:    wikileaks  |  julian assange  |  sweden

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24


Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.