News24

Obama: Iran talks to calm 'drums of war'

2012-03-07 13:06

Washington - President Barack Obama said an announcement of six-power talks with Iran offered a diplomatic chance to defuse a crisis over its nuclear programme and quiet the "drums of war".

EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who represents the United States, Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany in dealings with Iran, announced on Tuesday a fresh bid to allay suspicions that Iran is developing nuclear weapons after weeks of consultations with the other powers.

A date and venue have yet to be agreed for the talks, proposed by Iran after a year's diplomatic standstill that has increased fears of a slide into a new Middle East war.

Amid mounting speculation that Iran's nuclear sites could be attacked in coming months, Obama said that American politicians "beating the drums of war" had a responsibility to explain the costs and benefits of military action.

He said the notion that the United States needed to make a choice in coming weeks or months was "not borne out by facts".

But he said Washington would "not countenance" Iran getting a nuclear weapon, shortly after Defence Secretary Leon Panetta said the United States would take military action to prevent this happening if diplomacy failed.

Israeli military action

"Military action is the last alternative when all else fails," Panetta told the annual policy conference of the biggest US pro-Israel lobbying group, AIPAC. "But make no mistake, when all else fails, we will act."

With Israel speaking increasingly loudly of resorting to military action, the talks could provide some respite in a crisis that has driven up oil prices and threatened to suck the United States into its third major war in a decade.

Iran's nuclear negotiator, Saeed Jalili, wrote to Ashton in February saying Tehran wanted to re-open negotiations and offering to bring unspecified "new initiatives" to the table.

"Today I have replied to Dr Jalili's letter of February 14," Ashton, speaking on behalf of the six powers after weeks of consultations with them, said in a statement. "I have offered to resume talks with Iran on the nuclear issue."

A senior EU official said these talks were not expected before the Iranian New Year in two weeks, though there would be a series of preparatory meetings, possibly in the coming days.

"Our overall goal remains a comprehensive, negotiated, long-term solution which restores international confidence in the exclusively peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear programme, while respecting Iran's right to the peaceful use of nuclear energy," Ashton said in her reply to Jalili.

Economic pain


Western states are likely to tread cautiously, mindful of past accusations that Iran's willingness to talk has been a stalling tactic to blunt pressure and not a route to agreement.

The Islamic Republic's latest approach to the six powers comes at a time when it is suffering unprecedented economic pain from expanding oil and financial sanctions.

The resumption of talks could slow a drift towards military strikes on a uranium enrichment programme that Iran is gradually moving underground in what the West fears is an attempt to put a weapons programme beyond reach. Iran says its research is aimed purely at electricity generation.

Israel, which says its existence will be threatened if Iran develops nuclear armaments, is losing confidence in Western efforts to rein in the Islamic Republic with sanctions and diplomatic pressure.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu assured Obama on Monday that the Jewish state had made no decision on attacking Iranian nuclear sites, sources close to talks in Washington said. But he gave no sign of backing away from the option of military strikes.

The new prospect of diplomacy contributed to a fall in oil prices on Tuesday, with Brent crude falling $1.82 to just under $122 a barrel, although prices edged up around 40 cents on Wednesday.

Bank dealings

The senior EU official said there were reasons to believe talks with Iran might be productive.

"The first is that there is clear written commitment by Iran to be willing to address the nuclear issue in talks," the official said. "Second is the unity of the international community ... Third is certainly sanctions."

In an effort to further tighten the sanctions screw, a US congressman and congressional aides said lawmakers were working on legislation to force European and Aisan banks with US accounts to directly report to the US Treasury their transactions with Iranian financial institutions.

Dismayed that the Treasury has not yet punished any foreign banks for dealing with Iran's central bank after a first, lawmakers are looking at ways to force the Obama administration to quickly penalise firms who continue to work with Tehran.

"There is growing suspicion that European and Asian banks are not fully disclosing sanctionable activity," an aide said.

Russia, which built Iran's first nuclear power plant and has far warmer relations with Tehran than Western nations do, has often stressed the need for talks and said coercive pressure on Tehran is counterproductive.

Nuclear site visit

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said last month that global powers must work harder to seek agreement with Iran, warning that Tehran's appetite for concessions was waning as it moves closer to being able to build atomic weapons.

On Tuesday, Ryabkov said he hoped fresh talks with Iran would address a proposal by president-elect Vladimir Putin for global powers to formally recognise Iran's right to enrich uranium, Tehran to submit its programme to full IAEA supervision and international sanctions to be lifted.

Iran said on Tuesday it would let UN nuclear inspectors visit a military site where they have been repeatedly refused access, to check intelligence suggesting that explosives tests relevant to atom bombs have been conducted there.

However, diplomats noted a proviso in the Iranian statement saying that access to the Parchin site still hinged on a broader agreement on how to settle outstanding issues, which the two sides have been unable to reach for five years.

An International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report in November said that Iran had built a large containment chamber at Parchin, southeast of Tehran, to conduct high-explosives experiments that are "strong indicators" of an effort to design atomic bombs.

Pre-emptive bombs

Years of tortuous negotiations have often come unstuck over procedural obstacles imposed by Iran since the IAEA first began seeking unfettered access almost a decade ago to check indications of illicit military nuclear activity.

Israel has mooted pre-emptive bombings against Iran, a hawkish approach that Obama - wary of the risk of igniting a new Middle East war and a global surge in oil prices as he seeks re-election in November - has tried to restrain to give time for harsher sanctions and diplomatic pressure to bear fruit.

"The pressure [on Iran] is growing but time is growing short," Netanyahu was quoted by aides as telling Obama.

Later, addressing the influential pro-Israel lobby AIPAC, Netanyahu said: "None of us can afford to wait much longer. As prime minister of Israel, I will never let my people live in the shadow of annihilation."

Comments
  • Almin - 2012-03-07 14:57

    Netanyahu is just talking much. How can his people live in a shadow of anhilation when israel is believed to have hundreds of nuclear warhead while iran is just in the beginning of nuclear technology? He just want to get world sympathy.No sane person should believe him.

      Fred - 2012-03-07 16:31

      Israel is under constant attack from the Iranian regime, which funds terrorism in the region and uses the Palestinians to distract the Iranian people from their lack of human rights. Iran has threatened again and again to eliminate Israel, and it denies the occurrence of the Holocaust. In the Holocaust, the Jewish people suffered the single biggest attempt at human genocide in the history of humankind: six million killed in the matter of a few years. Israel and the freer world will never let Iran have a nuclear weapon, nor should they.

      Fred - 2012-03-07 16:32

      Until there's regime change, and a new constitution based on universal human rights.

      Alan - 2012-03-07 17:48

      Israel's neighbours would like to see the end of them. It started the day that the Jewish state was declared to the world back in 1948. The sentiment has not changed in the last 64 years. The threat of annihilation is very real.

      Adil Smit - 2012-03-07 20:28

      Fred, when did Iran attack Israel?

      Fred - 2012-03-08 09:01

      Indirectly, through Palestinian extremists who they instigate and fund.

  • Tshe - 2012-03-07 15:16

    Iran does not stand a chance, should sanctions be glorified, Global powers have upper-hand. Iran as well; watch the space is gonna be neutralized the same as Iraq, Afghan and Pakistan. Guess which companies will benefit out of Iran saga should there be military operation by global powers.Israel is confident cause they've got backing of global powers, pity to the poor Palestians. If you cant beat them, join!

  • Markose - 2012-03-07 20:19

    Why would Iran actually bomb Israel? Jerusalem is home of the Al Aqsa Mosque AND the Dome of the Rock, the fourth holiest site in Islam, where Mohammad ascended to heaven to meet God and all the Prophets of Islam, a pretty stupid target for the World's largest (Muslim) theocracy. That would also come with the additional bonus of pissing off the rest of the Muslim world and being put in the awkward position of having started a war of aggression (specifically prohibited by the Qur'an). Anyways, The Iranians don't even have the refinery capacity to make gasoline for themselves and you expect them to be able to deliver a nuclear payload all the way to Israel? Furthermore the Iranians are outmatched and surrounded by a ring of US military bases (If the US decides to go to war with them). Even if Iran acquires a nuke (and that's a BIG if), they're going to use it just like North Korea used their nuclear arsenal to take back South Korea, oh, that's right, THEY HAVEN'T.

      Fred - 2012-03-08 09:03

      It would entrench this cruel, oppressive regime until kingdom come, which would be negative for our world, and especially women who they stone to death mercilessly for no apparent reason.

  • pages:
  • 1