Obama robs Republicans of trump card

2011-05-04 14:55

Washington - President Barack Obama's use of big stick power to eliminate Osama bin Laden may deprive Republicans of one of their most trusty political tactics: Branding Democrats as national security weaklings.

The risky raid deep into Pakistan that killed the al-Qaeda chief nearly 10 years after the September 11 attacks, came at a time when Obama was on the backfoot on foreign policy and as he fired up his 2012 bid for a second term.

There was no suggestion the operation was a fiendish plot to improve his poll numbers, but politics are shaped by events. Public perceptions of a leader's mettle on the world stage are an important driver of presidential elections.

Republicans have often criticised Obama for being hesitant to wield US might, but by acting with decisive force against America's most reviled foe, he has enhanced his stature, at home and abroad.

Conservatives have also rebuked Obama for "apology tours" abroad, accused him of embracing US enemies at the expense of allies and, until Sunday's raid, lambasted him for "passivity" over revolts in the Arab world.

After Obama gambled on a secretive, risky special forces mission to at last avenge the attacks that killed nearly 3 000 people in the United States, that case became harder to make.

Credibility boost

"Their talking points have to change... the narrative that we are not strong in the war on terror - that cannot be done now," Steve Clemons of the New America Foundation said.

"His credibility as a hard power guy just went up a few notches.

"It makes him a much less vulnerable target," added Clemons, publisher of the influential blog The Washington Note.

The president won praise from an unlikely source on Wednesday, The Wall Street Journal's reliably conservative editorial page.

Foreign policy writer Bret Stephens predicted the episode would squelch conservative conspiracy theories about Obama's birthplace, which the president was forced to address last week after they erupted into mainstream politics.

"If there ever was a doubt about how American Mr Obama is, Sunday's raid eliminates it better than any long-form birth certificate," said Stephens.

"This was his finest hour."

Future stumble

While the political world awaits data assessing an expected "bounce" in Obama's diminished poll ratings in the wake of bin Laden's demise, it is doubtful the president can ride the wave all the way to next year's election.

Events always upset best-laid campaign plans, and bin Laden's death, while a huge symbolic success for Washington, may not improve US vulnerability to terror groups or ease a thicket of foreign policy challenges.

And a major future stumble by the president on a national security crisis could still change the picture before the next election.

"Right now, he is in good shape on this question - but I would add the caveat that this is always subject to events," said Bruce Buchanan, a political scientist at the University of Texas at Austin.

US elections are traditionally fought on economic territory, and Republicans may hope that rising gas prices, high jobless figures and stunted economic growth will dash Obama's hopes of a second term.

Foreign policy triumphs are also no guarantee of success at the polls: George Bush senior won the Gulf War in 1991, but was turfed out of office in an economic downturn by Bill Clinton in 1992.

As Obama embarks upon his re-election run, Republicans have been dusting off familiar themes, consistent with an effective decades-long narrative according to which Democrats lack fire in the belly.

His decision to allow European nations to take the lead in protecting civilians after an initial American blitz in Libya exposed the president to charges he was confused and reticent in projecting US power abroad.


"We used to relish leading the free world, now it's like leading the free world is an inconvenience," Republican Senator Lindsey Graham told Fox News.

Graham's theme was a familiar one. In 2004, then-president George W Bush regularly slammed his Democratic presidential opponent John Kerry as soft on terror - using the September 11 attacks as a prism.

"Five years after 9/11, the worst attack on the American homeland in our history, Democrats offer nothing but criticism and obstruction and endless second-guessing," Bush said in 2006 as he lambasted his foes as "the party of cut and run".

Since the bin Laden killing, both political parties have observed a general truce, with Republicans praising Obama for his decisive action.

But there have also been clear signs of politics boiling beneath the surface.

Obama administration officials have repeatedly stressed that the president ordered a redoubling of efforts to track down bin Laden after he took office.

Some Republicans argued enhanced interrogation techniques, outlawed by Obama and branded by opponents as torture, were crucial in revealing intelligence that indirectly led the CIA to bin Laden's lair.

The White House says such theories stretch credulity.

  • John - 2011-05-04 16:06

    Interesting...Bush must've choked while having breakfast when he heard Osama is dead. His "moment" got stolen! VIVA OBAMA! DOWN WITH BUSH!

      Brendon - 2011-05-04 18:13

      Obama = Bush 2.0

      wesleywt - 2011-05-05 10:24

      Brendon is weird.

      Joe_Massahar - 2011-05-05 14:09

      Wesleywt is an idiot!! Obama is becoming more of a Bush each day!!

  • Boerseun - 2011-05-04 18:15

    In the end Obama will not win, simply as most Yanks have realized that his economic/social policies are making them all poor. Just look how the USD have lost value...printing money to pay for all this social spending is a main culprit.

      Corry - 2011-05-04 21:17

      Boerseun, dude! tHe loss of strength of the dollar is on purpose as America has huge foreign debt (mostly to China) This debt in US$ so the weaker the dollar the qiocker and easier it is to pay back. The republicans NEVER wanted to win the last election, hence Cheney (74 with heart history) and Palin (Dukakis wannabe) as their candidates. tHey knew the crap they caused was going to cause massive kak so get the Democrats in , they take the blame and the Republicans come back in 2012 almost unopposed. It doesn't help the Democrats however with their very "welfare state" policies furthering burdening the middle and upper classes.

      John Wilderness - 2011-05-05 02:15

      @Corry your posting would probably thrown in the dustbin as wild speculation and a conspiracy theorists rant by many, but I actually think that your view is valid and very probable. Why else would the republicans put a crippled duck and a fruit cake forward as their candidates ? It makes sense that when the republicans broke the system they needed to somebody else to clean the mess and take the flak and Obama was "their" man.

      lenand40 - 2011-05-05 13:14

      @Corry. Actually, Cheney did not run for elections. It was McCain, a senator from Arizona.

  • NEWS24SUX - 2011-05-04 20:36


      Meyer - 2011-05-05 07:20

      Clever name idiot

  • JR - 2011-05-05 08:21

    Obama got the nobel prize on the run, has not even proven himself yet. Guess he has proven himself now showing how peaceful he really is. I decided to take the target, I me the big brerry I. Not thank you to the thousands of troops that gave their lives but ME I did it. Change my ass.

  • pages:
  • 1