News24

Obama steps into political unknown

2012-05-10 12:59

Washington - US President Barack Obama took a calculated gamble and stepped into the political unknown on Wednesday with his firm public backing for gay marriage, after a long period of personal soul searching.

Obama's move, in an interview with ABC News, sent seismic waves through pre-election politics and sparked immediate speculation as to whether he had hindered his chances of winning a second term in November.

But it also led his election foe Mitt Romney and his Republicans onto tricky ground, as the party's social conservative base opposes same sex marriage, even as it becomes quickly more accepted across the broader political spectrum.

"I've just concluded, for me, personally, it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to get married," Obama said, unveiling his bombshell.

Obama has now abandoned the sheltered but increasingly untenable position that he was "evolving" on gay marriage.

The risks are clear, and dictated Obama's previous stance, despite fierce pressure for a more unequivocal stance from Obama's liberal base.

Trouble connecting

The sudden injection of a divisive moral-social question could hit Obama's prospects in battleground states that he needs in November.

He has always had trouble connecting with white, blue collar, socially conservative swing voters, and Wednesday's move will hardly help.

A case in point is North Carolina, which Obama won by less than 1% in 2012. On Tuesday 61% in the state voted to ban gay marriage, civil unions and domestic partnerships.

Some observers feel Obama could face a backlash from religious Hispanic and African-American voters, who helped sweep him into the White House in 2008.

"There may be a few white, religious Democrats whom he could lose in Ohio," said Professor Paul Beck of Ohio State University, adding that some Hispanics could drift away in Colorado or Florida.

"Still, I think the numbers will be small who are swayed at all by the position he took today," he said, ahead of an election shaping up to be dominated by the lagging economy.

Memories of Kerry defeat

Conservatives pledged to make Obama pay.

"Today's announcement almost ensures that marriage will again be a major issue in the presidential election," said Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council.

A senior Obama aide said it was unclear how the marriage issue would play politically, especially in battleground states such as Ohio.

Democrats shudder when they recall how ballot initiatives in swing states on social issues drove up Republican turnout in 2004 and helped defeat their presidential candidate John Kerry.

Dennis Goldford, a professor of political science at Drake University, Iowa, suggested Obama's decision reflected an "electoral and strategic calculation".

Democrats are more likely to favour gay rights, and those who most oppose the concept tend to be conservatives who would never vote for Obama anyway, he said.

Political master stroke?

"The question is whether there is anybody in the muddled middle on this issue, that this might alienate. But we don't know at this point."

It is just possible that Obama has pulled off a political master stroke, and decided to ride changing attitudes just at the right moment.

As another senior official explained, public perceptions on gay marriage are changing more quickly than almost any other political issue in America.

More people are coming into contact with families with single sex parents - a point Obama made in his interview when he said that he had talked about the issue with his girls, Malia and Sasha.

A Washington Post poll suggests that the US public has, like Obama, been evolving.

In 2006, only 36% backed legalising same-sex marriage, but in the latest poll, 52% said they were for it.

Pushed by Biden

The decision was greeted with joy in the gay and lesbian community and is certain to fire up Obama's political base, and give younger supporters seen as less energised than in 2008 a jolt.

Wealthy gay and lesbian voters are also important contributors to Obama's re-election campaign.

One more question about Obama's move on Wednesday was: Why now?

He seems to have been pushed by Vice President Joe Biden, who said on NBC on Sunday that he was "absolutely comfortable" with same-sex marriage.

A senior Obama official said that though Biden's move had advanced the process, the president had already concluded that he had to come out for gay marriage before the Democratic National Convention in September.

The official also used the issue to draw a sharp contrast with Romney, who the Obama camp has been portraying as extreme in a bid to limit his appeal to the key political middle.

He noted that Obama now favoured gay marriage while Romney wanted to enshrine discrimination with a federal amendment to the US Constitution to ban it.

"I believe marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman," Romney said on Wednesday. "I know other people have differing views, and this is a tender and sensitive topic."

Comments
  • Denny - 2012-05-10 14:15

    Ah well, he took his time but got there in the end I suppose. I've no doubt it was due to his inner feelings rather than his populist leanings :P.

      Stephen - 2012-05-10 14:41

      "Evolving position" scared to say what he thinks, in case it loses votes. What must that feel be like for a gay person to be born into a Christian family, reading from a book that describes you as an abomination? Must not do a persons self esteem much good, thinking you’re going to go to hell no matter how you live your life.

  • Stephen - 2012-05-10 14:50

    I wonder how many gay people have commited suicide over the last few centuries, because of what that book tells them. Hey! perhaps the book is bogus , and there's nothing bad about you?

      fred.fraser.12 - 2012-05-10 17:26

      Couldn't agree more. Although not all of the bible is bogus. The idea that it's the word of god of course is. It's man's rendition of the word of god, with tragic consequences in some instances, such as the one you mention.

  • Boos - 2012-05-10 16:57

    @Stephen -- Troll

  • pages:
  • 1