Obama's larger Syria strategy in disarray

2013-09-14 18:00
US President Barack Obama (File, AP)

US President Barack Obama (File, AP)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Washington - After 2½ years of civil war in Syria, President Barack Obama's larger policy is in disarray even as his administration, with help from Russia, averted a military showdown for the time being.

US and Russian diplomats, meeting in Geneva, said on Saturday they had a deal on a framework for Syria to destroy its chemical weapons. The officials intend to seek a UN Security Council resolution that could authorise penalties, short of military action, if Syrian President Bashar Assad's government fails to comply.

Four days earlier, in an address to the American people, Obama said he was working with US allies to "provide humanitarian support, to help the moderate opposition and to shape a political settlement" for ending a conflict that has killed more than 100 000 people and made refugees of millions more.

That simple message belies a hodgepodge of often contradicting goals and strategies unlikely to be resolved by the new international effort to get Assad's government to relinquish its chemical weapons or by any US military action, if diplomacy fails.

These include Obama's vacillations on providing military assistance to rebels as part of a peace strategy and his repeated demand that Assad relinquish power but still retain a veto over any replacement government.

The difficulty in understanding what America is trying to do in Syria has persisted in the current debate over how to respond to the Assad government's alleged use of chemical weapons.

Threatening military reprisals, Obama said that the "United States military doesn't do pinpricks" only a day after Secretary of State John Kerry promised an "unbelievably small" operation.

In the last few days Obama has turned again to help from Russia, a Syrian ally the US repeatedly has accused of being complicit in the Assad government's wartime atrocities.

A look at how US policy in Syria has evolved:

The end of engagement

Arab Spring-inspired demonstrations erupt across Syria in March 2011. The unrest comes as the Obama administration is hoping to coax Assad into ending Syria's alliance with Iran and support for militant groups Hamas and Hezbollah. As the protests spread and reprisals worsen, U.S. engagement narrows to trying to get the Syrian government to respect political opponents and move toward democracy.

Then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton says Assad is seen by some US lawmakers as a "reformer." Days earlier, Kerry, then a US senator, argues that Syria is poised for change "as it embraces a legitimate relationship with the United States and the West."

The administration resists calls over the next months to recall the US ambassador, the first senior American posted to Damascus in five years. Obama reacts to increased brutality by Assad's forces in April by ordering a new set of sanctions against Syria.

 Violence escalates, with Assad sending tanks into cities throughout the summer. Citizens and defecting soldiers take up arms against government. By August, Obama publicly calls on Assad to resign.

Rebuffed at the UN

The US and allies take their case to the United Nations in October 2011, asking the Security Council to condemn human rights violations in Syria and demand an end to violence. Russia and China veto the resolution.

That month, the US pulls Ambassador Robert Ford out of Damascus because of security concerns. Ford returns in December, then leaves for good two months later. The US tries anew at the UN in February 2012, backing an Arab-proposed plan to hold Syrian human rights violators accountable. Russia and China again exercise their veto.

The US turns to Arab and European allies and convenes the first "Friends of Syria" conference in Tunisia to seek ways to support Syria's opposition. US intelligence officials start warning about al-Qaida and other extremist militants joining the fray. Still hopeful of finding a peaceful resolution, the U.S. urges that no one send weapons to either side. The violence worsens. In March 2012, Obama pledges "nonlethal" aid to the rebels. The UN says about 8 000 are dead after a year of violence.

False diplomatic hope

Secretary of State Clinton believes she secures Russia's commitment on a path forward in June 2012 with the "Geneva process." It calls for a Syrian transitional government through negotiation between Assad's government and the opposition.

Within hours of signing on to the strategy, the US and Russia bicker over whether the agreement includes Assad relinquishing power. Russia and China veto a third UN resolution in July after the US and its allies try to make the agreement enforceable. The process fizzles out without delivering peace talks.

Arab governments disregard the US call for a weapons embargo and supply the rebels with increasingly advanced weaponry. 

Obama rebuffs suggestions by Clinton, CIA Director David Petraeus and other senior US officials to provide weapons to moderate opposition forces. By July, the UN says 5 000 Syrians are dying each month in the fighting.

Red line

Responding to worrying intelligence indications, Obama declares in August 2012 that the use or deployment of the Syrian government's chemical weapons stockpiles is a "red line," which if crossed would change America's calculus in the conflict.

Rebel military advances stall. At the behest of Washington and others, the Islamist-dominated political opposition reforms itself in November 2012 to include more moderates and minorities. The UN puts the death toll since the beginning of the conflict at 60 000.

 In December, the US recognises the Syrian Opposition Coalition as the Syrian people's legitimate representative. US humanitarian aid increases significantly. Washington also puts one rebel faction, the al-Qaida-linked Nusra Front, on the US terrorism blacklist.

New assertiveness

Obama starts his second term as president and Kerry replaces Clinton as secretary of state. The U.S. becomes more assertive in its rhetoric about shifting the Syrian civil war's momentum and trying to convince Assad that he cannot prevail militarily and should relinquish power.

In February 2013, the US decides to send medical kits, food and other forms of nonlethal aid directly to the rebels but refuses to join its Arab partners in sending weapons. In March, Syrian rebels and Assad's government accuse each other of using chemical weapons.

The US begins investigating. In May, Kerry travels to Moscow and revives the Geneva peace process. US and Russian officials again differ on whether Assad must relinquish power. Like its predecessor, the "Geneva II" effort delivers no progress.

Chemical warfare

US intelligence concludes in June that Assad's forces used small amounts of the nerve agent sarin in several attacks. Obama responds by authorising the delivery of lethal aid to Syria's rebels, but no weapons or ammunition are sent.

Military officials express increasingly dire assessments of the role al-Qaida and other terrorist groups are playing in Syria and the options available for US military intervention.

By July, the UN secretary-general says more than 100 000 people have died. The war takes an even more ominous turn on 21 August with a massive chemical weapons attack outside Damascus.

Within days, the US declares with "high confidence" that Assad's forces are responsible and says more than 1 400 people, including more than 400 children, were killed.

Red line crossed

Obama and top aides threaten limited military action. Four US destroyers equipped with cruise missiles are put on standby in the eastern Mediterranean Sea.

The Parliament in Britain, America's closest military partner, rejects using force in an 29 August vote and US officials raise the possibility of a unilateral American attack.

Two days later, Obama asks Congress for official authorisation to strike. Encountering resistance, the president and his advisers say he can act even if Congress rejects his request.

President rebuffed

Democrats and Republicans in the House and Senate increasingly voice opposition to Obama's strategy. Obama meets Russian President Vladimir Putin on the sidelines of a global economic summit on 6 September and they discuss diplomatic alternatives to get Assad to surrender his chemical weapons stockpiles.

Obama asks Senate leaders on 9 September  to delay voting on authorising military action. He addresses the nation on 10 September and tries to persuade Americans to support military action in Syria if diplomacy fails.

Assad's government announces its intention to sign the UN treaty banning chemical weapons and hand over its stockpiles. Diplomatic wrangling continues between the US and Russia over how to verify that Syria lives up to the deal in a timely manner and what consequences it should face if it doesn't. US officials say the Syrian rebels have received a first package of US lethal aid.

Read more on:    un  |  bashir assad  |  hillary clinton  |  barack obama  |  vladimir putin  |  syria  |  us  |  russia

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24


Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.