News24

UK ends detention of asylum seeker kids

2010-12-16 19:52

London - The British government said on Thursday it would end the "shameful" practice of holding the children of failed asylum-seekers in detention centres while they await deportation.

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said the family wing at Yarl's Wood removal centre outside London, the main site for holding women and children, would close immediately and the practice would end completely by May.

Children's campaign group Barnardo's welcomed the announcement, which it said signalled a "good day for the UK's reputation as a nation".

Clegg said the decision, the fulfilment of an election pledge by his Liberal Democrats party, which shares power in Prime Minister David Cameron's Conservative-led coalition, marked a "big culture shift" in immigration.

1 000 children detained in 2009

It "puts our values - the protection of children - above paranoia over our borders", he said.

"We are ending the shameful practice that last year alone saw over 1 000 children - 1 000 innocent children - imprisoned. The practice under (the former government run by) Labour, saw children literally taken from their homes, without warning, and placed behind bars."

Under the new plans, families who have failed in their application to remain in Britain will be managed by an independent panel of experts, and will be given help to plan their return home.

As a last resort, if they refuse help and refuse to go home, they could spend up to 72 hours in independently-run, "pre-departure accommodation". But the children will be able to leave the premises, unlike under current rules.

Good day for UK

Martin Narey, chief executive of Barnardo's, welcomed the move as "a good day for the desperate and wretched families who will no longer have to suffer the trauma" of immigration detention centres, and a good day for Britain.

"The end of child detention at Yarl's Wood is a hugely significant event," he said.

"Incarcerating them simply because they have parents who wish to live here was unnecessary, expensive and more to the point, just plain wrong."

He said the last resort solution was a "small and necessary price to pay".
 

Comments
  • Big Mouth - 2010-12-17 06:06

    Flippen softies. I believe in fighting to protect what is yours. Why let others take advantage of you, because you are soft.

      Gail - 2010-12-17 12:54

      Do you also feel that Kill the farmer Kill the boer is correct then since white people are interlopers in Africa? They too were refugees in many cases who fought to stay and changed the culture and fibre of the African continent. I am white and 61 years old by the way. Think before you speak.

  • pages:
  • 1