US aims for psychological effect on Syria

2013-09-04 20:25

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Washington - Limited military strikes against Syria favoured by President Barack Obama may have a psychological effect but little practical impact on the Damascus regime's firepower, experts said on Wednesday.

Vowing to avoid large-scale, open-ended action, Obama has proposed a "shot across the bow" in a bid to punish President Bashar Assad for allegedly resorting to chemical weapons.

"In a shot across the bow, you don't hit anything. It's a demonstration of resolve," said Michael Eisenstadt, a former US military adviser.

"If that's the way he sees it, then it really doesn't matter whether it's 50 or 100 [Tomahawk missiles]," he said.

"It's just the very fact that you're doing it, that should be enough."

The Obama administration is believed to be contemplating a series of cruise missile strikes that would likely hit command posts, airfields and units linked to chemical attacks.

The Pentagon says the goal of punitive strikes would be to "deter" Assad from using chemical weapons again and "degrade" his army's ability to launch the lethal agents.

But even after a wave of missile strikes launched from warships and possibly from B-2 bombers, Assad's forces would still have artillery capable of unleashing lethal sarin gas or other chemical agents, analysts said.

"If we really wanted a military effect, what we could do is deprive the Assad regime of its most efficient delivery mechanism [for chemical weapons] - artillery," said Jeffrey Martini, a Middle East analyst at the Rand Corporation think tank.

"That operation would look a lot different from the one that it seems the administration in envisioning," he told AFP.

The military action that Congress is now debating appears to be about "psychological" effects and not "military effectiveness", he said.

Giving Syria time

Leaks and a political debate in Washington over the merits of intervention has removed any element of surprise, allowing the Syrian regime time to disperse troops and equipment that could be targeted in any action, experts said.

"That clearly makes it more difficult to accomplish a certain minimal amount of damage on the Syrians," said Eisenstadt, senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

The US military's top officer, General Martin Dempsey, told lawmakers Tuesday there was no doubt American forces would inflict damage on Syria's chemical weapons capacity and would be using an extensive list of targets.

"I'm confident in the capabilities we can bring to bear to deter and degrade," said Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

"And it won't surprise you to know that we will have not only an initial target set but subsequent target sets should they become necessary," said the four-star general, implying the operation could last beyond a single day.

The administration hopes to "alter Assad's calculus," said Steven Pifer of the Brookings Institution, but there are no guarantees.

"Two weeks ago, all evidence suggests that Assad felt he could use chemical weapons with impunity," he said.

"A punitive military strike would demonstrate that such action has costs and might - might - affect his future calculation."

With Congress pushing Obama to impose explicit restrictions on the operation, including prohibiting any "boots on the ground," the constraints could undermine the intended psychological impact of the missile strikes, according to Eisenstadt.

"Probably the main way Assad will respond will be to use chemical weapons again, but probably on a much lower level, similar to the way he did previously," he said.

"In order to put the administration in the horns of a dilemma."

Obama would then have to consider a second wave of strikes, opening himself up to criticism that he is dragging the United States into a quagmire -despite promising to avoid a repeat of the Iraq debacle.

In that scenario, if the United States chose not to launch further action, "Assad will be able to claim that he is unbroken, unbowed and defiant," Eisenstadt said.

"And it puts us in a very difficult situation."

Read more on:    us  |  syria  |  syria conflict

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
5 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

 
/News

Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
Traffic
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.