Diplomats disagree over Syria chemical sanctions

2016-08-31 11:23
 Russia's UN Ambassador Vitaly Churkin speaks at the United Nations headquarters. (AP)

Russia's UN Ambassador Vitaly Churkin speaks at the United Nations headquarters. (AP)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

United Nations - The UN Security Council failed to agree on Tuesday on whether Syria merited sanctions over the use of chemical weapons, with Russia questioning the evidence from an independent commission that found government forces were behind at least two such attacks.

Council members met to discuss the findings of an international team of inspectors that determined that both the Syrian government and ISIS were responsible for chemical attacks carried out in 2014 and 2015.

But Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin, whose country is a close ally of the Syrian government, said it was too early to consider implementing a September 2013 council resolution authorizing sanctions that can be militarily enforced for any use of chemical weapons in Syria.

"Clearly, there is a smoking gun. We know that chlorine most likely has been used — that was already the finding of the fact-finding mission before — but there are no fingerprints on the gun," Churkin said following the closed-door session.

"There is nobody to sanction in the report which has been issued," he said. "It contains no names, it contains no specifics. ... If we are to be professional we need to question all the conclusions."

Churkin said, however, that he was pleased the report had confirmed the use of chemical weapons by the Islamic State group.

Heading into the meeting, US Ambassador Samantha Power called the report "a landmark" and said she expected a Security Council resolution "soon".

"It is the first official independent confirmation of what many of us ... have presented substantial evidence of for a long time, and that is a pattern of chemical weapons use by the Syrian regime," Power said. "It is incumbent on the council to act swiftly to show ... we were serious about there being meaningful accountability."

Syria agreed to relinquish chemical weapons

In September 2013, Syria accepted a Russian proposal to relinquish its chemical weapons stockpile and join the Chemical Weapons Convention. That averted a US military strike in response to an alleged chemical weapons attack that killed hundreds in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta.

Russia has blocked sanctions and other council action against President Bashar Assad's government — but Moscow did support the establishment of the Joint Investigative Mechanism, charged with determining who was responsible for the attacks and paving the way for possible punishment.

The inspectors investigated nine cases in seven towns and determined the Syrian government was responsible for two attacks involving chlorine gas and ISIS — which is already under UN sanctions — for one attack involving mustard gas.

They said three more attacks pointed toward government involvement but weren't conclusive, and described three others as inconclusive.

Virginia Gamba, who headed the inspection team, defended their methodology but conceded that it was difficult to prove the use of chlorine, which is commercially available and evaporates quickly.

Only scratched the surface

Because of her team's narrow mandate, she said inspectors only scratched the surface of chemical weapons use in Syria, adding that they were "acutely aware of the ongoing use of chemicals as weapons in the Syrian Arab Republic."

Inspectors said that between December 2015 and August 2016 they received more than 130 new allegations from UN member states of the use of chemical weapons or toxic chemicals as weapons in Syria. They said the attacks involved sarin, mustard gas, VX nerve gas, chlorine, and 61 other toxic chemicals.

Syrian Ambassador Bashar Ja'afari dismissed the report's findings as biased.

"The conclusions contained in the report were totally based on statements made by witnesses presented by the terrorist armed groups," he said. "Therefore, these conclusions lack any physical evidence."

Ahead of the meeting, Human Rights Watch called on the Security Council to urgently impose sanctions on the Syrian government and to refer the case to the International Criminal Court but acknowledged that might be difficult in the Security Council where Russia holds a veto.

"This has been a political minefield for five and a half years but we have something different, we have an UN-backed mechanism with a report," said Louis Charbonneau, UN director at Human Rights Watch. "We have it in black and white that the Syrian Government and ISIS are responsible for using chemical weapons, it's a crime and the Security Council has many tools it can use, so we expect them to use them all."

Read more on:    un security council  |  isis  |  syria  |  chemical weapons

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24


Book flights

Compare, Book, Fly

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.