Gun control supporters are convinced their safety is dependent on removing citizens guns and that guns are responsible for all the violence and ills of the world.

The quickest way to remove a right is to remove it from a segment of society for the good of others on some unproven pretext or fear.

Guns as any dictionary will show are designed to launch a projectile. What screams at anyone who reads gun control articles is the unjustified fear inflicted on all.

Is owning a gun looking after our families future or is there more to it?

The calls for more stringent firearm legislation has stimulated considerable debate surrounding the notion of a crime free South Africa is a gun free South Africa.

Imagine a world without guns is what we are told to do. A world that is safe from violence and crime.

President Jacob Zuma very kindly stated the purpose of the Dangerous Weapons Act, which is to curb violence from disgruntled protesters mainly about poor government service delivery.

“You only have any rights because the rest of us pretty much agree that you have them.” What happens when the rest of us could not care less about those rights?

Oscar seems to have revitalised the gun control advocates who daily render a deluge of misinformation to the public and media.

With Sandy Hook and Oscar Pistorius all in the recent news. Calls for more discussion of gun control has surfaced something that has bothered me and I simply cannot understand.

“Licence” (Is gun control irrational?) questioned the irrationality of gun control recently that probing of the non-debate debate raised some interesting issues.

Is it reasonable for the police to expect that people should live a life in fear of criminals the police have not arrested and insist that people must comply with the criminal's demands?

With the recent shooting in the USA this question has once again risen to the surface mainly spurred on by gun control trying to promote more acceptance of stricter laws.

The shooting in Sandy Hook Elementary School had parents all over the country rushing to get their children home safe. But did the parents figured out what part they played in this tragedy?

Ever since man constructed weapons and used these for the aggressive gain of power and not hunting, defence or survival, those in power have sort to limit citizens from possessing arms.

Very recently a SAGA trustee resigned according to him due to bad governance. If true this is unforgivable .

What is "gun homicide" or "gun crime"? Do we have knife homicide, poison homicide or rope homicide?

All that is needed to remove a right is to allow it to be removed from others

Why do so many accept gun control as valid? Do they not value their rights or do they think government has the right to infringe our liberty, freedom, safety and happiness?

Declaration of Independence and Affirmation of the Constitution of the USA still the world very best. Clear concise and cannot be misinterpreted yet it is.

Be reasonable is emotional blackmail and in most cases beware when it is used as often what you are asked to do is not reasonable.

I keep asking the gun prohibitionists, gun haters, cowards, the paranoid prone and the little children who need somebody else to protect them where has gun control worked?

Gun control has a vast organisation of many willing people who all work for the eradication of your rights and removing your guns from you.

How important is the right to arms? The first thing the NP government did was deny blacks the right to firearm ownership for good reason.

In the beginning, there was a simple but much abused by the SAPS firearm law. It was unjustified and a waste of valuable police time.

We all want to live in peace having the safety and freedom we deserve because anything less is not life but misery and slavery.