SA blasts UN over Western Sahara rights

2012-04-25 09:13

New York - South Africa on Tuesday accused UN Security Council powers of "conveniently" ignoring human rights abuses in the disputed territory of Western Sahara.

The council again rejected growing demands for the UN peacekeeping force in the Moroccan-controlled territory to have a permanent rights investigation duty.

But the annual resolution renewing the mandate of the UN force did stress the need for Morocco to improve rights in Western Sahara, which it annexed in 1975 following a Spanish withdrawal.

South Africa's UN ambassador Baso Sangqu said the 15-nation council was guilty of "double standards" by taking "bold steps" over the Arab Spring countries but refusing a permanent rights monitoring system for Western Sahara.

The rights of the people of Western Sahara must be "equally defended with the same zeal and commitment", he told the council.

Without naming countries, he said "the selective approach to human rights by this council calls into question the motivation of those who have conveniently looked the other way while human rights abuses are committed in Western Sahara".

France, a permanent member of the council, is a strong backer of Morocco but has strongly denied trying to influence the Western Sahara talks. South Africa and Morocco are current temporary members of the council.

This year's talks on the UN mission were held amid growing UN complaints that its mission in the sparsely populated phosphate-rich territory is being "undermined" by Moroccan tactics.

The Security Council resolution, which renewed the peacekeeping mandate mandate until April 2013, stressed "the importance of improving the human rights situation in Western Sahara and the Tindouf camps".

Disharmony and tension

Morocco controls the bulk of the territory. The Polisario Front, which fought a guerrilla war against the Moroccans until a UN-brokered ceasefire in 1991, governs the Tindouf camps in Algeria which were set up for Sahrawis who fled the conflict.

The resolution called on the two sides "to work with the international community to develop and implement independent and credible measures to ensure full respect for human rights".

The peacekeepers are officially known as the UN Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO). Efforts to organise a vote for the Sahrawi people have been deadlocked for years however.

The UN-brokered talks have failed to make progress on a political solution between the Polisario Front and Morocco.

Morocco's UN ambassador Mohammed Loulichki said the council had been "quite correct" to again reject "broadening the mandate to bring in questions which have nothing to do with the function" of the UN mission.

"Morocco makes a commitment to the [UN-brokered] negotiations" on the territory, said Loulichki. But he reaffirmed Morocco's claim to sovereignty over Western Sahara and said a referendum could lead to "disharmony and tension".

The Polisario Front's UN envoy, Ahmed Boukhari, also condemned what he called the "intrigues and subterfuges" of council members, including France, and said it had not been strong enough on human rights.

"It does not respond to the demands of international human rights organizations nor to the gravity of the situation on the ground, which reveals that there are dozens of Sahrawi political prisoners, hundreds of disappeared in addition to those who have died in detention in Moroccan secret prisons," he said in a statement.

  • Fidel - 2012-04-25 11:17

    Those so called human rights loving countries have always spoken out of both sides of their mouths.

  • Greg - 2012-04-25 11:21

    Our SA government should be ashemed of themselves for their double standards with the Zimbabwe situation. Human rights violations on a daily basis and they sit on their hands and strap their mouths shut. What hypocracy!!!!

      Fidel - 2012-04-25 11:33

      There is a political contract in Zimbabwe agreed by both the MDC and ZANU and it must be allowed to run its course, and until the opposition makes a formal complaint to SADC, there is nothing that the SA government can do. Zimbabwe is not a colony of SA and we are in no position to dictate to either Mugabe or his opponent what needs to be done to that country.

      Morrone - 2012-04-25 12:41

      Teach this MAMPARA some political lessons Fidel!!

  • Averroes - 2012-04-25 14:52

    The sahara was, is and will always be part of the ancient Kingdom of Morocco. Unlike South Africa, our nation wasn't established on the back of colonialism but was actually divided by the colonialists. Where was South Africa's voice when only recently Mustapha Salma Ould Sidi Mouloud (former police chief of the Polisario Front) was kidnapped, imprisoned and tortured by the Polisario Front and their masters in Algiers for speaking out? Not only is this so-called South African government full of hypocrisy, this corrupt cabal are drowned in betrayal...a betrayal foremost of truth. The sahara, never western, forever Moroccan.

  • Altan - 2012-04-26 07:41

    Morocco should sweep Spanish people in the motherland of Morocco and then think about Western Sahara

      Averroes - 2012-04-26 16:25

      Great idea Altan. We'll open another front with Spain (& with that the EU & NATO - which let me remind you, Turkey is member to) whilst we're already having to defend ourselves from the war waged on us by the heirs of colonialism in Algiers & their puppet Marxist organisation (& with them yet, all the Nasserite States, leftists & all the AU states oil money can buy). Sebta & Melilia are going nowhere & are tied to the dispute Spain has with the UK over Gibraltar. The Sahara on the other hand has already been eaten away from us oasis by oasis, dune by dune, grain by grain by the dictate & design of the colonial powers, & later in the name of Arabism and Marxism. "The present work proposes to show that the Western Sahara, like Mauritania and the frontier regions of Algeria has never ceased to be under the political, economic and cultural influence of Morocco and that it would be absurd to create a new pseudo state when a state of indisputably ancient origin and modern structure is ready to welcome a regions that has, in reality, never ceased being integrated in it." "Morocco today can legitimately claim the right to a territorial boundary at the 1901 line." The betrayal of the Arab, African & Muslim world in standing Morocco's corner against this onslaught is witnessed by God & we stand vindicated.

  • pages:
  • 1