US to attend Kenyatta's inauguration

2013-04-05 09:25
Uhuru Kenyatta (AFP)

Uhuru Kenyatta (AFP)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Nairobi - An American election observer group led by former president Jimmy Carter said on Thursday that Kenya's March 4 presidential election suffered serious technological shortcomings and that election officials at times prevented observers from carrying out their mission, but it said the election's paper trail preserved the will of Kenyan voters.

The Carter Centre said the initial release by Kenya's election commission of inaccurate vote figures challenged voter confidence in the commission. It also said a lack of transparency in the national count marred the vote.

The commission named Uhuru Kenyatta the winner with 50.07% of the vote. The result was challenged by Prime Minister Raila Odinga and civil society groups but upheld by the Supreme Court.

Kenyatta is wanted by the International Criminal Court on charges related to the deadly violence Kenya saw after its 2007 election. Those charges have threatened to cool Kenya's relations with the West.

However, the United States Embassy says its ambassador will attend Kenyatta's swearing-in next week. Britain, Kenya's other major Western partner, has not yet announced if its high commissioner will attend. Kenyatta's team accused Britain's top representative in Kenya of meddling in election matters, straining the countries' relations.

The Carter Centre congratulated the people of Kenya on keeping peace in spite of long lines on election day, the release of inaccurate early electronic results and being provided with uneven turnout figures from vote tallies. The centre said that the election commission, known as the IEBC, confined party representatives and election observers to the sidelines at the national counting centre, "making effective observation impossible".

"In the absence of access to compiled documents and to IEBC personnel, the national tally of the presidential results forms was effectively rendered non-transparent for stakeholders and observers," the Carter Centre said.

Positive and negative observations

Government officials and civil groups tried to ensure violence did not break out en masse during this election, as it did in 2007-08, when more than 1 000 people were killed. Five people died in violence after the Supreme Court upheld Kenyatta's win but most of the country remained peaceful.

The Carter Centre called it "worrying" that the number of registered voters announced by the electoral commission changed in the last weeks of the voting process. A variation of 100 000 registered voters suggested that data had changed with no explanation from the electoral board and no opportunity for public scrutiny.

The Carter Centre, echoing complaints by Odinga and the civil society groups, said it regretted that the election commission was unwilling to publish results by polling station. The IEBC has said it carried out a free and fair election but it was not able to explain all of the voter number discrepancies before the Supreme Court.

Gladwell Otieno, the executive director of the Africa Centre for Open Governance, which challenged the election results at the Supreme Court, said the Carter Centre’s findings — a mixture of positive and negative observations — is the result of a difficult balancing act for observers, given that Odinga accepted the court's decision to uphold Kenyatta's win.

"The flaws in the process were so manifest it wouldn't be credible if they didn't recognise them," she said. "As civil society we have to be grateful that the IEBC is being put on the spot because that has to happen. At the same time I don't see how they could describe the manual tallying as acceptable or credible."

Gladwell noted that the judiciary's own report from the registrar of the Supreme Court lists one Kenyan voting region — Laikipia West, with 70 760 votes — as being unable to verify votes cast. Kenyatta secured his majority election win by only 8 400 votes out of more than 12.3 million cast. Field reports for Gladwell's organization indicated that many constituencies saw turnout over 100 percent.

"We feel that the IEBC has to answer for its conduct and its use of public money," Otieno said. "We think the IEBC really, really let Kenyans down and we can't just sweep this under the carpet. We have another election in five short years."

Read more on:    uhuru kenyatta  |  raila odinga  |  jimmy carter  |  kenya  |  us  |  kenya elections 2013  |  east africa

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.