Zimbabwe vote puts AU, SADC in the dock

2013-07-29 22:41
Picture: AP

Picture: AP

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Johannesburg - With many international observers barred from covering Zimbabwe's crunch election on Wednesday, the AU and SADC are becoming the eyes and ears of the world in a stern test of their credibility.

When Robert Mugabe's government released the list of roughly 50 countries and groups invited to observe this week's crunch presidential and parliament elections, there were few surprises.

It was, in essence, a handpicked list of nations - Russia, Venezuela, China, Sudan, Cuba, Belarus and Iran - not usually known for their commitment to democracy.

While all embassies in Harare will be allowed five observers, fully blown missions from the United Nations, the United States, the European Union and anyone considered hostile to Mugabe's attempt to extend his 33-year rule were blocked.

Hopes for a substantial and credible account of the election rest with the African Union (AU) and the 15-member Southern African Development Community (SADC).

But even before an early civilian vote earlier this month ahead of the election had been cast, the AU's 60-strong mission to monitor the vote appeared at risk of losing its democratic bona fides.

Amid the chaotic early vote for police and security personnel, serious doubts about the state of the electoral roll and rampant partisanship by state media, the AU expressed confidence in a free and fair vote.

"On the whole we got the impression that the preparations were satisfactory," said AU commission chair Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma.

That raised eyebrows across the continent. Mugabe's perennial challenger Morgan Tsvangirai went as far as to describe Dlamini-Zuma's account of events as "misleading".

For many, her comment had troubling echoes of the AU and SADC's performance in previous elections.

Peaceful and credible

Both declared a 2011 vote in the Democratic Republic of Congo successful, despite outside observers reporting a panoply of problems.

In Zimbabwe itself, SADC declared the recent constitutional referendum "peaceful and credible" despite the detention of prominent human rights lawyers and Tsvangirai allies.

"The reason you want international monitors is to have actors that are more likely to be neutral," said Judith Kelley, author of Monitoring Democracy, a book on election monitors.

"Both the AU and SADC are likely to enter this election with some bias because of their membership countries' affiliation with Zimbabwe."

But for SADC in particular, much is riding on its take on the vote.

The EU, after decades of playing bad cop, seems set to defer to SADC's verdict on the vote.

"We don't have the right to continue with [sanctions] if the elections are acceptable," Roeland van de Geer, the EU's ambassador to South Africa, said recently. "But it has to be clear that's true."

And in many ways these elections are of SADC's making.

Fed up with chronic instability and a flood of Zimbabwean economic refugees across their borders, the bloc forced Mugabe and Tsvangirai into a power-sharing government following the bloodshed of the 2008 vote.

Severe credibility test

It also forced both men to agree a new constitution which paved the way for the vote.

But SADC still has to prove it is dependable.

"The Southern African Development Community and the African Union face severe credibility tests," the International Crisis Group said in a report published on Monday.

"There is growing concern, however, that both organisations may opt for a narrow evaluation of the elections."

"If the vote is deeply flawed, they should declare it illegitimate and press for a re-run after several months of careful preparation or, if that is not possible, facilitate negotiation of a compromise acceptable to the major parties."

In the coming days as election reports are released, many will be closely monitoring the monitors.

Read more on:    au  |  sadc  |  zimbabwe  |  zimbabwe elections 2013

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.