Advanced driver couldn’t have avoided Zuma’s accident – expert

2014-11-13 11:54

Even an experienced driver trained in defensive driving could not have avoided an accident on a rainy night, an inquest into a car accident involving President Jacob Zuma’s son has heard.

“If I was a defensive driver, and driving on that road under those circumstances, I could have experienced the same incident,” accident reconstruction expert Johannes Strydom told the inquest at the Randburg Magistrates’ Court today.

“Not even a defensive driver could have avoided that,” he said.

Magistrate Lolita Chetty had asked Strydom whether he blamed Duduzane Zuma for the accident.

Earlier, the inquest heard that the testimony of the expert contradicts the evidence of Zuma regarding the direction that his luxury car turned after hitting a puddle of water.

“Mr Zuma said his Porsche veered to the left after hitting a puddle; you have heard his evidence. Yesterday you explained how the accident happened and gave a demonstration. You said his car veered to the right. Why the inconsistency?” prosecutor Yusuf Baba asked Strydom.

Strydom replied that when a car hit a puddle it was possible that it would turn to the left, especially when there was too much water up front.

In his statement, President Jacob Zuma’s son said he lost control of his Porsche after it hit a puddle. It spun and hit the back of a minibus taxi, coming to a standstill facing oncoming traffic.

Zuma’s car rear-ended Jabulani Vusi Dlamini’s minibus taxi on a rainy night in February. Passenger Phumzile Dube was killed and three others were injured.

The accident happened on the M1 south offramp to Grayston Drive in Sandton.

In July, the National Prosecuting Authority said it declined to prosecute Zuma due to insufficient evidence. The matter would be referred to a magistrate for a formal inquest to determine whether the accident was caused by human error.

The inquest completed hearing evidence from witnesses.

Johan van Loggerenberg from the Johannesburg metro police department would not testify as planned, because it was concluded that his evidence and that of Strydom was the same.

The inquest decided it was not necessarily to have his input, and closing arguments would be heard.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.