BEE harmful to all South Africans – Solidarity

2013-03-13 16:20

Black economic empowerment (BEE) is to the detriment of all South Africans, including blacks, trade union Solidarity has said.

It was for this reason recommending that the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Amendment Bill of 2012 be withdrawn, it said in a statement.

The union made the proposal during a presentation to Parliament’s portfolio committee on trade and industry today.

Solidarity research institute senior economic researcher Piet le Roux said the bill’s purpose was to enable the government to enforce current BEE legislation more stringently.

“The amendment bill will result in all South Africans being disadvantaged, including those who are supposed to benefit from BEE.

“The bill will lead to even more resources being made available to relatively less competent entrepreneurs – black, coloured, Indian and white – those entrepreneurs who would not make the grade without government assistance.”

This meant fewer consumer goods would be available to all South Africans. The cost of the project would fall on ordinary consumers, who would have to pay more for basic goods.

Le Roux said it was important to remember it was not just “less competent” black entrepreneurs who benefit from artificial investment, but also whites.

“White entrepreneurs who would not have made it in the market, but who somehow managed to get a black, coloured or Indian BEE partner, are being kept in business at the expense of consumers,” he said.

Not all emerging entrepreneurs depended on government assistance, but BEE enabled weaker entrepreneurs to do business in an artificial and unsustainable way.

“Consumers in the market reveal the most effective entrepreneurs through their spending patterns. The most effective entrepreneurs are those who are able to offer consumers the greatest flow of goods and services in the cheapest way,” said Le Roux.

Investors took note of spending patterns and, based on these, allocated resources to entrepreneurs. BEE replaced this consumer-driven allocation with a politically-driven process.

When there was political interference, resources tended to flow to less effective entrepreneurs.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.