Betty’s bitter bread-and- butter battle

2011-04-02 14:38

Betty Dukes told me almost seven years ago, declaiming from a park bench near her lawyer’s office in Berkeley, California: “We, the women of Walmart, will have our day in court.

“Walmart will answer our charges – they have treated us unfairly and we deserved better.”

Dukes, who still works at Walmart, is the lead plaintiff in Betty Dukes vs Walmart Stores, the largest civil-rights class-action suit in history, which accuses the retail giant of sex discrimination in pay, promotions and hiring.

The potential class has at times included more than one million women (recently, though, estimates have run closer to the hundreds of thousands).

Dukes and her colleagues have yet to have their day in court, all these years later, and if an army of right-wing opponents has its way, they never will.

The Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday on the certification of Dukes vs Walmart.

That means the judges must now decide not whether Betty Dukes and her co-workers experienced discrimination – that crucial question may be left forever undecided by the US legal system?– but whether their case should move forward as a class-action suit.

At issue is whether it is possible to make any legal claims at all about institutional discrimination at a large company.

Walmart argues that the class is too large and that plaintiffs’ description of its practices is not credible: How could so many women encounter sexism from so many managers?

Yet female employees at Walmart have been paid less than men in nearly every job category and promoted less often, despite lower turnover rates and better job performance ratings.

Although legal arguments were made yesterday, a look at the authors of the amicus briefs on both sides shows that the certification of Dukes is really an economic and ideological battle.

On Betty’s side, liberal groups like the Consumers’ Union, United Food and Commercial Workers and Public Citizen – anyone who believes that citizens should be able to use the legal system to wrest systemic change from large corporations – have weighed in.

On behalf of Walmart, much fatter cats have rallied, including the US Chamber of Commerce, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, Intel, Altria, Bank of America, Del Monte Foods, Fedex, Microsoft, Costco and many others.

In addition to these corporate interests, conservative champions of an even more libertarian order – the Washington Legal Foundation, Atlantic Legal Foundation, New England Legal Foundation – are also lending Walmart their support.

Dukes vs Walmart’s opponents are united in their desire to suppress the ability of workers and consumers to sue large companies.

The Supreme Court itself may have an ideological agenda here too.

As legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin and other observers have pointed out, it is unlikely that the court will have agreed to hear Dukes unless the judges wanted to strike it down.

After all, class-action suits have been such beloved bugbears of the right, and some of the justices are fierce warriors of conservative causes.

No decision is expected on Dukes for at least a month, and possibly not until the end of June.

If the certification is struck down it will be a triumph for the right, making class-action lawsuits even more difficult to litigate and win.

To be sure, the plaintiffs have already enjoyed some victories.

The case has exposed Walmart’s employment practices to the public, and everyday sexism in its stores no longer goes completely unchallenged. Betty Dukes says the lawsuit has changed Walmart.

It is now easier for women to learn about open positions and to enter the ranks of management.

“I have personally been thanked by women who have been promoted,” Dukes said today, speaking hoarsely, as she has been talking about her case nonstop these past few days.

But even if the court upholds certification of Dukes, and the women do get their day in court, we have to ask why we have become so dependent on such an inefficient means of justice. Dukes brought her case 10 years ago – and courts have still not even begun to debate its merits.

With stronger unions, more aggressive government enforcement and better-organised social movements, class-action suits like Dukes’s probably would not even be needed.

Yet the Supreme Court challenge and a ferocious line-up of briefs are testament to the tenacity of the corporate elite and of the right.

The class action may be a feeble instrument of justice, but it is one of the few we have left – and that is why they are so eager to take it away.

» Featherstone is the author of Selling Women Short: The Landmark Battle for Worker’s Rights at Walmart.
Copyright © 2011 The Nation – distributed by Agence Global

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.