Ex must wait for pension

2010-10-09 14:46

Mothapelo Ramocheca was furious to learn that the Government ­Employees Pension Fund would not pay out her divorce benefit until her former husband went on ­retirement.

She was so angry that she threatened to lodge a case of unfair discrimination against the fund with the ­Human Rights Commission.

Ramocheca said she did not understand why the organisation did not apply the clean-break rule, which would have entitled her to the 50% ­portion of her ­ex-husband’s pension benefit.

They finalised the divorce in October last year.

The clean-break rule allows for the payment of a divorce benefit at the date of the ­divorce, rather than an ­unspecified ­future date such as the date of retirement.

Meanwhile, private-sector pension funds are beginning to apply the rule.

“I think this is unfair to me. Just because my ex-husband works for the government I cannot get the money, even though the law has changed”, she complained.

Ramocheca’s ex-husband was a police officer.

She said she was surprised when his employer, the South African ­Police Service, told her she would have to wait until her ex-husband retired before they would pay out the money.

“I have a problem with that because the money does not earn interest.

“I want to get it now so that I can invest it for my kids and get the interest,” she said.

Hotline approached the fund to find out why it was not ­applying the clean-break rule.

Spokesperson Ofentse ­Seleka said although the fund was aware of the rule, it did not apply to ­government ­employees.

He said the rule was ­introduced by the Pension Funds Adjudicator’s office, which ­administered the ­Pension Funds Act.

Seleka said: “The Pensions Funds Act is not applicable to the government pension fund. This fund was established by the Government Service ­Pension Act.

“The act has not been amended to include this rule.”

He also said that at the ­moment the fund was ­compelled to follow the ­Divorce Act, which allowed pension benefits to be payable at a future date.

“Nevertheless, the incorporation of the clean-break principle is currently being considered by the fund,” he said.

He also advised Ramocheca to resubmit her claim because the fund had no record of it.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.