FPB on banned film: ‘We note the attacks against us and are unfazed’

2013-07-24 12:46

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

A Film and Publication Board (FPB) workshop at the Durban International Film Festival this morning turned into a heated discussion about what was, in effect, a banning of the festival’s opening film last week.

Of Good Report was refused classification because, said the FPB, it contains child pornography – a 23-year-old playing a 16-year-old character has sex with a sugar daddy. Showing or being in possession of the film was deemed criminal.

This morning’s Q&A session started on a dramatic note with the film’s producer, Michael Auret, challenging the FPB to admit it was negligent in its ruling in light of a landmark Constitutional Court judgment on the meaning of the definition of “child pornography” in the FPB Act, argued in the case of De Reuck v Director of Public Prosecutions.

When the Out in Africa film festival challenged a similar banning of the Argentinian film XXY, said Auret, they drew heavily on the De Reuck case – and the FPB ban was overturned on appeal.

The FPB’s Sipho Risiba responded angrily, saying that there was no negligence on the part of the FPB and that the FPB Act had been amended twice since that ruling, making it irrelevant.

The manager of the Durban festival, Peter Machen, then spoke, questioning why television shows can depict sugar-daddy sex storylines but films may not. He said that he believed the FPB had “acted unconstitutionally”.

“This is a model inherited from an old South Africa,” said Machen. “The real pornography is poverty and inequality.” As he spoke of the festival’s concern over social issues he became increasingly emotional, later leaving the room in tears.

Risiba then became angry. “We support our classifiers and stand by their decision,” he said. “We are in line with the Constitution. We are not here to justify the decision. We note the attacks against us and are unfazed. There will be an appeal process. We will defend our classification.”

It was FPB spokesperson Prince Ndamase who brought order to the meeting, assuring the industry that the FPB supported messaging against sugar daddies, but they had to follow the act and regulations that govern them. He questioned why the industry had not responded to a call for public participation when the FPB Act was being amended.

“Producers have attacked us,” he said. “We have been referred to as retards and morons. I have personally been threatened. But we have kept our cool.”

Several questions were raised about the classification committee having watched only the first 28 minutes and 16 seconds of Of Good Report. Ndamase responded that the FPB Act states that as soon as child pornography is identified in a film it must be switched off.

Returning to the meeting, Machen expressed concern that the FPB had asked for “mainly African films” to view before the festival. The board bases its requests on synopses of films submitted by the festival. It asked to see a record seven films this year. “Are we policing only African sexuality?” asked Machen.

Ndamase refuted this, saying “I note your concern but it doesn’t matter if it’s a (Jahmil) Qubeka or a (Steven) Spielberg.”

Machen and Auret have appealed the ruling. Ndamase said that the FPB was fast-tracking the appeal process because of the public outcry.

“We are trying to ensure that the appeal tribunal sits this week – judging by the enthusiasm from the public and media,” he said.

Afterwards, Auret told City Press that he was confused by the FPB’s response to his questions. “Either they’re lying about the amendments making the De Reuck judgment irrelevant to the case or else the amendments themselves are unconstitutional.”

On Monday, the film industry met in Durban and launched the Art Censorship SA campaign in response to the banning.

» This article was updated after first published to correct the name of Sipho Risiba. He was incorrectly referred to as Sipho Msiba.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.