Guptagate: 10 things worth knowing about the probe

2013-05-20 11:38

Not sure what to make of government’s briefing on the Guptagate investigation? City Press political reporter Carien du Plessis breaks it down for you:

1. President Jacob Zuma and his Cabinet were not involved in authorising the landing at Waterkloof and are therefore considered innocent.

2. The Guptas were turned down by Airports Company of SA in February when they wanted landing rights and “an elaborate reception for the wedding party”.

3. They were also turned down by Defence Minister Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula when they approached her “on different occasions” (presumably for permission to land at a military base) in March and on April 3.

4. The Gupta family then resorted to using diplomatic channels with the support of “an individual” at the Indian High Commission, who communicated directly with officials at Waterkloof. No note verbale was sent to the department of international relations as required.

5. Chief of State Protocol Bruce Koloane was the main actor in the irregular process because he acted in the absence of a note verbale. Some public servants lower down the chain of command did raise concerns which were ignored by superiors.

6. Waterkloof air force base is not a national key point but a strategic military base with strict rules and regulations. It receives both military and civilian aircraft but proper procedures must be followed.

7. The landing of the Gupta jet “had the potential to compromise the credibility” of the South African government and “could have caused severe reputational damage to the state itself”. In other words, it made us look like a banana republic.

8. Contrary to “dramatised” reports in the media and on social networking sites, the Gupta jet did not go for a joy ride over SA cities but complied with air traffic control procedures, protocol and instructions.

9. Because of the size of the convoy, with 121 cars, which took the Gupta guests to the wedding in Sun City, police had to help out. But there were also police officers who moonlighted illegally, carried firearms illegally outside their metro jurisdictions and who drove cars illegally fitted with blue lights.

10. Name-dropping by public servants is at the centre of the debacle, and they will be made aware that this is unethical and will in future be considered gross misconduct. The names of Zuma, Police Minister Nathi Mthethwa and Mapisa-Nqakula were used in this debacle.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.