How the SABC board nominees were chosen

2009-09-19 13:51

HOW Parliament chose its candidates for the SABC board – and the arm wrestling that went on behind the scenes – tells us a lot about power in this society and how it is ­exercised.

Most of the opposition parties refrained from making nominations.

“It is for the country to do, not us,” a Congress of the People member said to me.

But the ANC had its spokesperson, ­Jessie Duarte, make some nominations from Luthuli House – and those candidates were dead certainties to make the final list.

There were also SACP and Cosatu ­nominations, though these were done in conjunction with other civil society ­organisations like the SOS (Save our SABC) Coalition.

The short list of 30 was divided up by agreement: the opposition parties were given 10 spaces and the ANC 20.

When it was completed the ANC realised it had left out a strong candidate, Felleng Sekha, and it made her number 31. The ­opposition lost two of its candidates when they dropped out after the list was in.

After the interviews, when it came down to the final list the opposition apparently suggested the same process – they would put forward four names and the ANC eight – to make up the total board of 12.

It was agreed to go this route and it seemed possible that there could be a board everyone would vote in favour of.

The opposition put their heads together and came up with their list of about five names – but they wanted to see the ANC list first, so that they did not waste their allocation by duplicating names of people the ANC was going to nominate anyway.

When they saw the list they realised there were seven candidates on the ANC’s list of 12 that they felt they could support.
It seemed possible, they thought, that the parties could reach consensus on the full list. But before they could finalise their four the ANC came out of caucus on Thursday morning and said they were voting in their list of 12 and ditching their agreement to give four places to other parties, according to members of the opposition.

The IFP asked only one thing: that their veteran former MP and former communications spokesperson ­Suzanne Vos get on the board. The ANC gave them this and in turn the IFP was the only opposition ­party to vote for all ANC nominations.

It seems Vos was their 30 pieces of silver. For her they were prepared to forgo all questions about other candidates.

It is a pity that there was not a serious attempt to reach consensus, as that would have been a great start for a new board and would have maximised its credibility and ­authority. It seems that attempts to do this broke down in the ANC ­caucus.

In assessing the new board there are three things to consider.

First, how they were chosen. Last time around the committee allowed interference in the process and undermined the board’s credibility from day one.

This time the party caucus ruled. It is not surprising that they could not make four places for opposition nominees.
Can you imagine trying to get a caucus of hundreds of MPs to agree to remove four names from the list of 12? Every candidate would have had some special interest insisting that he or she be there.

It would have been ideal to achieve consensus and know there was widespread support for the board as a whole. That would have ensured there was no one on it whose credibility and credentials were being questioned.

The second important thing is obviously the list of names itself. Despite the flawed process, the list contains a good range of names, skills and experience. There are journalists, engineers, labour representatives and experienced business people among them. They appear to be relatively representative of the country.

There are a few surprise omissions.
David Lewis was much respected in his previous role as head of the Competitions Tribunal, and he is an experienced board member who has shown a commitment to public service. Isaac Shongwe, a widely ­respected businessman with media ­experience, did not even make the short list, for some strange reason.

Nevertheless, there is reasonable hope that this board is able to give the SABC a fresh start.

The third critical factor is the choice of chair. It is the pivotal position and ­demands strong leadership, boardroom experience, gravitas, skill and a sense of public ­service.

This is the person who will have to keep at bay those who would put pressure on the SABC in pursuit of their own sectoral ­interests, be they from government or the private ­sector.

This is the person who will have to prevent board members from interfering in the day-to-day running of the institution, as some previous board members did.

This is the person who will have to project a public-service vision and instill a new ethic and culture in a troubled ­organisation.
This is the person who will have to lead an important debate about funding ­models.

It is entirely the president’s prerogative to select the chair from the list of 12 board members before him. There are certainly some good candidates on the list, such as Ben Ngubane and Felleng Sekha.

May the president exercise his wisdom with thought and care. And then they can all get down to the urgent work at hand.

Harber is the Caxton Professor of Journalism at Wits University. This is an excerpt from his blog, The Harbinger

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.