How to lose a country gracefully

2011-03-05 12:44

As a reporter, I covered two of the greatest losers of the past century.

The superlative “greatest” applies both to the scale of the loss – Mikhail Gorbachev lost Russia and all its colonies, while FW de Klerk lost the richest country in Africa – and to the manner in which they lost.

Our hearts understandably thrill to the courage of those who stand up to power – from Tiananmen Square to Tahrir Square.

But there is another heroism, scarce and undervalued, that accrues to those who know how to stand down.

What Gorbachev and De Klerk did was not always pretty, and neither man is much celebrated in his own country these days.

But each relinquished the power of an abusive elite without subjecting his country to a civil bloodbath. Afterwards, they did not flee to the comfort of Swiss bank accounts.

On the contrary, they managed a feat that is almost unthinkable in most of today’s erupting autocracies: after succumbing to democracy, they contributed to its legitimacy by becoming candidates for high office – and losing fair and square.

De Klerk, the last white president of a South Africa that oppressed blacks for centuries, actually pressed the flesh and pleaded for votes in black townships, professing a kind of civic kinship I think he genuinely felt.

De Klerk and Gorbachev were triumphant partners in their own defeats, and thus in their countries’ victories.

It is always tricky comparing one country’s experience with another’s, but in the examples of these great losers, there are some broad lessons for all the countries now convulsed by the revolutionary spirit – and for those of us who watch and assess them, not to mention those who bankroll and arm them.

Freedom is a slippery slope
Both Gorbachev and De Klerk began as reformers – that is, politicians devoted to making a dreadful system less dreadful, not to actually abolishing it.

Perhaps because of the pressure exerted by years of international boycotts and decades of domestic insurgency, De Klerk was quicker than Gorbachev to recognise that his ruling party’s life project – a South Africa carved into a commonwealth of separate and independent nations, poor black ones and prosperous white ones – was cruelly absurd and ungovernable.

By the time I arrived in 1992, he was dragging his own party and some die-hard white separatists into a raucous convention of factions, races and tribes to write a new constitution.

White rule was clearly ending, and the only question was how ugly the end would be. Gorbachev, however, thought he was saving the Communist Party, right up to the day party stalwarts tried to overthrow him.

Those regimes along the ­Mediterranean rim that are ­trying to hold back an angry tide by shuffling their cabinets or promising so-called reforms – Jordan, ­Morocco, Saudi Arabia – may buy themselves some time, but revolutions have a way of overrunning reformers.

A little glasnost is a ­dangerous thing
The regimes that have sent their thugs against the press and tried to unplug the internet are right to fear the media.

I’ve cringed under the ­truncheons of Iran’s official ­vigilantes, and I worry every day for the safety of journalists. But I understand why journalists are targets.

Watching how the seep of ­information stirred ordinary Russians from a paralysing fear was one of the true joys of ­covering Moscow’s spring.

The Cold War voice of Radio Liberty, the underground copies of Solzhenitsyn and especially Gorbachev’s own attempts to deputise the Russian press by letting it expose corruption and incompetence – they all chipped away at the invincibility of the Soviet Union.

Today it is Al Jazeera, Wiki-Leaks’ cables about the extravagant lifestyles of the ruling elites and social media that are the fuel of popular insurgency.

This is how the unhappy learn that their complaints are justified and that they are not alone. With their vast reach and immediacy, Facebook and Twitter are not only sources of info but ­organising tools – samizdat on steroids.

Some of your best allies are in your jails
Gorbachev freed Andrei ­Sakharov from exile; De Klerk released Nelson Mandela.

Both leaders then enlisted their liberated adversaries as negotiating partners, buying some credibility at home and abroad.

These partnerships inevitably fell victim to mistrust, but they helped assure that the end of the old order was managed ­rather than catastrophic.

Armies are people too
We tend to think of armies as instruments. But they are also constituencies with families to feed, jobs to protect, a stake in the future, a yearning for ­respect.

If a leader can command his army only with threats of summary execution or by holding family members hostage, as Muammar Gaddafi is reported to have done, you can safely bet his days are numbered.

One of the smartest things De Klerk did to prevent the civil war many feared in South Africa was to negotiate job security for the apartheid-era army.

And one of the smartest things Nelson Mandela did was accede to this demand, so that when he became the first president of a free South Africa he inherited a military that regarded him as their paymaster.

One man’s dead nuisance is ­another’s martyr
It is not a coincidence that the surge points of the current political unrest tend to be funerals, as they were in South Africa and restive Soviet republics.

From the massacre in Sharpeville to the protesters crushed under the tank treads of a rogue army unit in Soviet Lithuania, from the persecuted fruit vendor who immolated himself in ­Tunisia to the crowds strafed in Libya, the dead live on as evidence of a regime’s cruelty. And few cultures cherish their martyrs as devoutly as Islam does.

Winning is the easy part
Congratulations, you ousted the tyrant, you won an election, your inaugural address stirred the hearts of your people.

Now here’s your giant goodie bag of festering misery ­– Egypt! – where the army runs the private sector, the mullahs may or may not be spoiling to impose shariah law, the tourists have been scared off, poverty and unemployment are rife, and any day the score-settling will begin.

Today, Russia and South Africa are disillusioned democracies. Wretched poverty, crime and bad governance bedevil South Africa. Russia is corrupt and intolerant of political dissent, sometimes brutally so.

Yet each country has grown bigger middle classes, expanded individual liberties and mostly kept its armies at peace. And if the Russians or South Africans run out of patience with their imperfect leaders, they have some hope of remedies other than the streets.

Gorbachev turned 80 earlier this month and De Klerk will be 75 soon.

Happy birthday to both. And here’s to those who make history by gracefully ­getting out of its way. – New ­York Times

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.