Info bill two steps from becoming law

2012-11-30 08:38

A move by the ANC, driving final amendments to the protection of state information bill through the National Council of Provinces amid protest, has brought the so-called secrecy bill two steps from becoming law.

In an often raucous debate yesterday, State Security Minister Siyabonga Cwele claimed it was the most progressive official secrets legislation worldwide.

The Democratic Alliance countered that it remained reminiscent of a police state.

The amended bill was adopted by 34 votes to 16, and will go back to the National Assembly in the new year, where the ANC majority is likely to pass it with ease.

Opposition parties vowed that if that happened they would ask the Constitutional Court to overturn the legislation, a threat also issued by the Right2Know campaign this week.

DA MP Alf Lees accused the ANC of misleading the public by claiming extensive amendments to the bill had ruled out the possibility of a state official using it to conceal wrongdoing.

“Given the levels of corruption we see in government today it is inevitable that the bill will be used to cover up crime and corruption by those who risk exposure,” he said to ANC jeers.

Lees said the bill still imposed excessive prison sentences, raised the spectre of journalists being jailed for espionage and lacked a proper public interest defence clause to protect the media and whistleblowers.

His colleague, Albert Fritz, added that if it had been on the lawbooks, the recent Sunday Times report on the corruption case against President Jacob Zuma – based on leaked prosecuting authority information – would never have seen the light.

“This bill is Stasi-like in its content and design,” he charged, referring to the feared former East German secret police.

Cwele said remaining opposition to the bill was the result of a campaign of misrepresentation by the opposition and civil rights activists.

He conceded that the bill lacked a public interest defence, and that its definition of national security as the grounds for classification was wider than that in the apartheid-era legislation it seeks to repeal, the 1982 Protection of Information Act.

But he said the latter was designed to “protect the people”, while the new one was motivated by the belief that it was unwise to let ordinary citizens decide whether disclosure would serve the public interest.

“The problem with the public defence clause is the associated risk where any member of the public can decide what is in the public interest, when the head of (an) organ (of state) or courts for instance may be in a better position to objectively weigh up the issues.”

The ANC said it was sure the bill would withstand a constitutional challenge.

“You can go to the Constitutional Court, we are waiting for you,” the ANC’s Teboho Chaane said.

Threat to democracy

The Right2Know Campaign maintains the bill still clashes with the constitutional rights to freedom of information and expression and is likely to lead to over-classification.

Addressing this point, Cwele said these were not absolute rights, but that on the contrary the Constitution recognised the supremacy of security requirements.

“It needs to be emphasised that the rights in our Constitution... are not absolute as they are subject to section 36, which limits these rights.

“No such limitation exists on the provisions of chapter 11 pertaining to national security and the security services and their oversight structures.”

The minister acknowledged that the bill has become “one of the most talked about pieces of security legislation here and abroad”, but insisted the final draft balanced transparency and security.

The bill was introduced in 2010 and triggered a sustained public outcry that forced the ruling party into a staged withdrawal from some of its most regressive provisions.

This week, after coming under renewed pressure from the Congress of SA Trade Unions, the ANC introduced eleventh-hour changes that were widely welcomed.

It notably re-inserted a clause offering protection against prosecution for those who reveal classified information to expose a crime, despite pressure from Cwele to scrap it.

The party scrapped a clause that would have made the new legislation trump the Promotion of Access to Information Act, and thirdly gave the Public Protector and other chapter nine institutions the right to be in possession of classified information.

But opponents say the bill retains a clear threat to democracy in clauses that make mere possession of a classified document a crime and allow the intelligence structures to operate in obscurity.

- Sapa

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.