Inside Labour: On a loan to poverty

2014-07-25 06:45

Official statistics note that borrowing by South African households has declined slightly. But we remain a nation wallowing in debt. And this applies from the government down to the humblest of families.

Along with the steady increase in the cost of living, this is a major reason for prolonged and bitter strikes and for ongoing social instability.

Admittedly, we are not alone in facing a heavy debt burden: many countries face similar or, on the face of it, worse situations.

But because of our recent history and the heightened – and now largely frustrated – expectations of the 1994 transition, the level of desperation and anger among the relatively impoverished majority is understandable.

And, as we are regularly reminded, we have certainly one of the worst discrepancies between rich and poor anywhere in the world (if not the worst).

At the same time, a number of corporations and companies continue to reward their directors and chief executives with pay packets that are justifiably regarded as obscene.

It is therefore understandable that such factors result in anger and bitterness among low-paid workers and the unemployed. And there is every indication things are getting worse.

The decline in the value of the rand, for example, is already being felt in the rise in fuel prices that will have a knock-on effect throughout the economy.

If history is anything to go by, this situation will again see the country moving toward a period of higher interest rates.

And this will almost certainly force more citizens into the ranks of the 10?million who already have what are politely referred to as “impaired credit records”.

It is not as if there is anything new in this situation. A decade ago, with concern being expressed that the poor were carrying a disproportionate debt burden, government opened debate on the National Credit Act (NCA), which took effect seven years ago.

It is a good example of how actions based on the best of intentions can backfire.

In the first place, the NCA made it more difficult for lower-paid workers to access credit. The legislation also restricted the rate of interest that may be levied on “microloans” (those under R8?000) to 5% a month.

But this is equal to 60% a year – and does not take account of administrative fees and other legal “add-ons”.

To ensure payment, some lenders have also demanded – and have been granted – the right to have debt repayments made directly from an employee’s wages.

Many of these “garnishment orders” have been shown to be illegal, both in terms of not having been approved by the courts and to have included interest payments beyond the limits of the NCA.

Once again, it is the army of the working poor who are the main sufferers and, as was recently revealed, many of them are miners.

But it is not only a lack of financial education that leads workers into signing away more than they legally should; desperation is more than sufficient.

There are millions of South Africans who cannot – or do not know how to – access already exorbitantly priced loans from legitimate sources.

Their only recourse is to go to the mashonisas, the township loan sharks whose interest rates and methods of debt collection can only be described as brutal.

Because many workers often require relatively small loans for short periods, employees in a few workplaces have operated on the stokvel principle, putting money into a common “pot” that can be drawn on by those in need of a loan until payday.

It is a practice the unions could have adopted, but never did, so opening the door to “payday lenders” such as British-based adheres to the NCA, providing loans of up to R2?500 for 30 days or less. But a R2?500 loan over 30 days costs R541.96.

Because administrative and other fees added to the legal 60% per year interest rate remain the same no matter the size or term of the loan, a lesser amount over a shorter period results in much higher repayments.

For example, to settle a R100 loan over seven days costs R176.10.

There is obviously great demand for payday loans and is extremely profitable.

Here is a clear lesson for the labour movement: surely its billions in investment funds would be better and more profitably used in providing reasonably priced loans to members rather than going to investment companies that – to use union terminology – rely on the exploitation of other workers.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.