Inside Labour: When rights clash with tradition

2014-09-25 13:45

Is South Africa on the brink of a clash between the egalitarian concepts embodied in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and the demands to retain undemocratic, feudal and colonial hangovers of the past?

If so, Swaziland may provide the catalyst.

This became clear in the past week during a series of events that threw into sharp relief the myriad political contradictions that exist domestically.

They were illustrated in the labour movement-led demands for human and democratic rights in Swaziland at the same time that increasingly closer links at a political level were forged with the brutally autocratic regime in that country.

Last week, for the first time, the leadership of the entire ANC-led governing alliance unanimously condemned the actions of the monarchy in Swaziland.

The ANC, Cosatu, the SA Communist Party and the SA National Civic Organisation have insisted “the people and government of Swaziland speedily move towards democracy”.

In a statement issued after its September 12 meeting, the governing alliance called for the release of all political prisoners in Swaziland and demanded: “South Africa must confer refugee status on those fleeing from political persecution in their home country.”

Agreement would put South Africa on a diplomatic collision course with the kingdom.

Significantly, this meeting and statement came only hours before that gargantuan political princeling and nephew of President Jacob Zuma, Khulubuse, established another link with the royal house of Swaziland.

In what was described in this paper as a “king-size wedding”, Khulubuse married Princess Fikisiwe Dlamini, a niece of Africa’s last absolute monarch, Mswati III.

In attendance were ministers and other leading members of the ANC as thousands of guests sang songs praising the president and vilifying Public Protector Thuli Madonsela.

Mswati’s brother, Prince Mbuyusa Dlamini, hailed the union as further cementing the relations between “the Zulu and Swazi nations”.

What it also did was provide another slap in the face for the nearly 5?000 Aurora miners who have waited five years for wages owed to them by the company in which Khulubuse was a major figure.

At least one of the miners, Marius Ferreira – owed R170?000 and having lost his house, car and all his possessions – has committed suicide.

But the fate of the miners is clearly less important, in media terms, than the extravagant matrimonial goings-on of traditional and putative royalty.

In July, and to considerable fanfare, the effective civil servant monarch of the Zulu kingdom, Goodwill Zwelithini, also sealed a matrimonial link with the Swazi house of Dlamini when he married his sixth wife and mother of two of his 28 children, Queen Zola Mafu.

President Zuma has also, for more than 11 years, kept his fiancée and intended fifth wife, the half-sister of Mswati, waiting for the final matrimonial summons.

In all these cases, tradition, with its acceptance of the Swazi regime and of hereditary rule, is dominant.

Local monarchs and lesser royalty may be on the state payroll – the cost of Zwelithini’s household, for example, is estimated at more than R63?million a year – but they remain unelected rulers of often large tracts of land and of the people who reside on them.

And both Zwelithini and Mswati have indicated they have their eyes on considerably more real estate.

But in terms of finance, Mswati leads the way: he uses the Treasury of his country as something of a personal piggy bank. Mswati epitomises what traditional, feudal rule means: his word is law. The only law.

Yet this autocrat is accepted as the national representative of his people at gatherings of the at least nominally democratic members of the Southern African Development Community (SADC).

Can this – and should this – continue? But if the South African government acts to support democracy and human rights in Swaziland, will this start a process to examine the myriad political contradictions that exist domestically, even down to the existence of the National House of Traditional Leaders?

This is what the latest decision by the alliance secretariat indicates. It opens a can of worms politically. But perhaps a can that needs to be opened.

And since, on the basis of support for parliamentary democracy, government has been willing to intervene in the affairs of Lesotho, why should Swaziland be any different?

It is a perfectly logical question, and one that needs to be answered.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.