Is Zuma decisive or expedient? You decide

2011-09-24 08:46

On one level, it would be churlish not to welcome President Jacob Zuma’s ­decisiveness over the past week.

He has taken three important steps. Firstly, he declared that he would appoint a commission of inquiry into the arms deal that has vexed the ANC since 1999. Secondly, the ANC shelved the pernicious ­Protection of State Information Bill.

Thirdly, he ­announced that he had, as long ago as August, asked National Police Commissioner Bheki Cele to present him with reasons the presidency should not appoint a board of inquiry into his conduct in the course of the signing of the police headquarters lease.

Public Protector Thuli Madonsela has found that the signing of the multimillion-rand leases was illegal.

She recommended action against ­public works minister Gwen Nkabinde-Mahlangu and sought an explanation from Cele, who is friends with Roux Shabangu, the landlord of the troublesome buildings.

Given that the arms deal scandal is 13 years old, action on the public protector’s report is well overdue.

It is important that the president is ­attempting to bring closure on these festering sores for the sake of good governance.
But is it as straightforward as that, or is it a game of smoke and mirrors?

We sincerely hope not, but here is the counterview.

The bill’s critics have for months been pointing out that it is anti-constitutional. The authorities have made some concessions, but refuse to budge on the core critique, which is that without a public interest defence for people who may possess classified information, it is a harmful draft law.

Until the eve of Zuma’s meeting with US ­President Barack Obama and other heads of state who support the Open Government Partnership, the ANC was deaf to these concerns.

Then when it became clear how embarrassing it would be to sign the partnership while passing the secrecy law, the bill was mysteriously shelved on the eve of voting.

The arms deal commission of inquiry is a ­similarly expedient step.

Anti-arms campaigner Terry Crawford-Browne, who petitioned the ­Constitutional Court to set up a commission, is due in court soon.

Precedent on the judgment in which the court ordered that the legislation to set up the Hawks does not create sufficient independence suggests he may be in with a chance. So, the president orders his own commission.

And while the public protector’s report offers plentiful evidence that the leases were illegally signed, the president is now going to appoint a board to go through all the same evidence.

It looks like a huge eye-blind to us and a deflection from action. Sorry, sir, we are not convinced. 

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.