It’s Booysen vs Jiba in February

2013-09-20 16:36

The application by suspended KwaZulu-Natal Hawks head General Johan Booysen to have his racketeering prosecution quashed will be heard by the Durban High Court next year.

Booysen’s lawyer, Carl van der Merwe, confirmed the application, brought against then acting national director of public prosecutions Nomgcobo Jiba, will be argued by counsel on February 7.

Booysen was charged, along with members of the now disbanded Cato Manor Serious and Violent Crimes Unit (SVCU), who allegedly murdered 29 suspects, planting firearms to make the killings look legal.

According to the indictment authorised by Jiba, he ran a criminal operation with his men, carrying out paid hits and manipulating the SAPS system to simultaneously secure promotions and merit awards.

In papers filed in support of the application, Booysen accused Jiba of ignoring evidence in her possession which proves his innocence on racketeering and murder charges.

Booysen has also accused her of misleading the court in her claim that she considered, among other things, statements by three witnesses as she did not have these at the time the decision to charge him was taken.

The high court murder and racketeering trial has been adjourned until Booysen’s bid to quash the charges in terms of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act (POCA) is heard.

In the last exchange of documents, Booysen said Jiba could not have properly considered the dockets in her possession, along with sworn statements from three witnesses, in her decision to charge him, as she had claimed.

At the time the decision was taken to charge him on August 17 last year, Jiba did not have the statements from Colonel Rajen Ayer, Greek national and former reservist Ari Danikas and a police informant known as Ndlondlo in her possession.

Jiba, he said, was being “mendacious’’ when she claimed she had used the statements in her decision making.

“She is invited to explain how she could have taken into account information on oath the objectively did not exist at the time of taking the decision,’’ Booysen said.

He claims Jiba had not applied the National Prosecuting Authority’s own policy directives in looking at the statements as the evidence in them relating to Booysen were “exculpatory’’ and did not implicate him.

He said had Jiba investigated Ndlondlo’s hearsay claims that they had carried out taxi hits, she would have found the two men named as paymasters, Sanele Zondi and Bongizwe Mhlongo, were his longstanding rivals. Both had disputed Ndlondlo’s version.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.