Knives out for renegade cop

2014-04-20 15:00

The senior officer who refused to take the fall for the police at the Marikana Commission of Inquiry will be recalled to the stand after two police ­officers changed their written statements and implicated him.

He refused to do so, and was the only witness from the police so far who has not been represented by SA Police Service (SAPS) lawyers.

Constable Joseph Sekgweleya, an officer from the police’s Rustenburg cluster; and Sergeant Nkosana Mguye from the North West Tactical Response Team, Rustenburg Unit, first wrote ­affidavits days after 34 ­miners were shot dead on August 16 2012.

These affidavits are contained in a list of exhibits held by the commission. Lieutenant Colonel Salmon ­Vermaak spent weeks on the stand at the commission.

He alleged in his testimony that national police commissioner General Riah Phiyega and North West commissioner Zukiswa Mbombo had told him he should take the blame for the miners’ deaths.

Vermaak is still due to be cross-examined. Lawyers for the SAPS have submitted supplementary statements on behalf of Mguye and

Sekgweleya, which are vastly different from their ­original affidavits.

These new statements, and the initial affidavits, only deal with the events of August 13, when two police officers were hacked to death by miners near a ­railway station.

The pair’s initial affidavits did not mention ­Vermaak at all – either as giving orders, being on the ground or chasing a group of miners.

But in Sekgweleya and Mguye’s supplementary statements, Vermaak is placed at the heart of that day’s operation and is described as giving orders.

City Press has reliably learnt that although ­Vermaak has already stepped down from the witness box, he will be recalled at a later stage so the police’s legal team can cross-examine him. It is not yet clear when this will happen.

The police’s apparent unwillingness to support one of its own hasn’t gone unnoticed.

The supplementary statements were handed in on April?8. On that day, commission chairperson Judge Ian Farlam said: “I wonder whether the

fairest thing is to say [to Vermaak] that we seriously suggest he gets independent legal advice.

“I understand, I’m not sure whether the police have agreed to it yet but I would imagine the police are certainly morally obliged to enable him to get legal representation as they were representing him at an earlier stage and if he is to be cross-examined on these statements, then he should be ­cross-examined in the presence of his own legal ­representative.”

The commission is due to resume on Tuesday.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.