MPs approve Info Bill changes

2013-04-22 16:43

The widely welcomed amendments to the Protection of State Information Bill have been unanimously approved by the members of the ad hoc committee finalising the draft bill.

After nearly three years of controversy and drafting changes, the bill will come another step closer to law tomorrow when MPs on the committee vote on the final draft of the bill, to which these changes have been added.

“Today we approved the amendments. We now have to approve the amended bill, with the changes made by the NCOP (National Council of Provinces) incorporated,” committee chairman Cecil Burgess said.

The bill will then be sent back to the National Assembly – which approved an earlier, considerably different version in late 2011 – where it will be put to the vote in its new form.

Burgess suggested this could happen as early as Thursday.

Opposition politicians and civil rights groups who fought tooth and nail against earlier drafts of the legislation, deemed a throwback to apartheid-era state secrecy, have welcomed the changes brought by the NCOP.

These include a clause offering protection from prosecution for anybody who reveals classified information to bring to light a crime.

The NCOP members also dropped from the bill a clause which sought to make the new law trump the progressive Promotion of Access to Information Act, and another that imposed heavy jail sentences for revealing any information relating to a “state security matter”.

Critics, including trade union federation Cosatu, argued persuasively the latter clause would create an all-powerful intelligence apparatus.

On Monday, the DA and the African Christian Democratic Party signalled that despite approving the amendments, their overall opposition to the bill stands.

DA MP Dene Smuts said her party believed the bill remained unconstitutional because it sought, wrongly, to govern keeping records by provincial archives.

“Public-record keeping is a provincial competency and Parliament ought not to be legislating on it at all,” she said.

Smuts said an alternative and separate argument was that, if the provision on archives were to stand, the bill should not have been processed as a section 75 but a section 76 bill, in terms of the Constitution, because it dealt with provincial powers.

If the bill is passed, the DA is expected to appeal to President Jacob Zuma to send it to the Constitutional Court for review before he signs it into law. Failing this, the opposition seems set to challenge the legislation in court.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.