Oprah dodges $100m lawsuit

2011-03-29 08:56

New York – A federal judge in Pennsylvania has tossed out an author’s $100 million (R686 million) lawsuit against Oprah Winfrey for violating the copyright in the political booklet, How America Elects Her Presidents.

Charles Harris claimed in a lawsuit that in 2008, as Winfrey began supporting Barack Obama’s presidential campaign, Harris sent 10 copies of his booklet to The Oprah Winfrey Show in hopes of gaining publicity.

He followed up with several inquiries. Harris got no response, but according to the complaint, on the February 16 2009 show, Winfrey allegedly read aloud exact questions that were included in the book. Harris wanted more than $100 million for alleged copyright infringement.

Winfrey filed a motion to dismiss, seeking sanctions for a frivolous lawsuit, saying that had the plaintiff obtained a public transcript of the show in question, he would have realised that the talk show host didn’t read Harris’ “exact same questions’’ aloud with the arguable exception of one: “Which one of our presidents weighed the most?’’

During the episode, titled Oprah’s Search For The Smartest and Most Talented Kids, she brought children on set, including one six-year-old named Graham who she said was a first-grade whizz kid who knows more about American presidents than most adults.

Oprah and Graham joshed about various presidents from George Washington to Barack Obama, before the talk show queen queried the kid about the heaviest president.

Graham correctly answered it was William Howard Taft at 327 pounds.

Winfrey’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit said Harris’ lawyers should have known that facts about American presidents are not copyrightable.

A compilation of facts based on the selection and arrangement can be copyrightable, but Winfrey pointed out that Harris didn’t register his work as a compilation, and it lacked originality, among other things.

US District Court Judge Jan DuBois agreed that Harris’ work is “not original”, and that Winfrey’s use of the Fat Taft fact, even if she did learn it from Harris’ book, was not an infringement.

The judge, however, determined that the plaintiff’s claims were made with reasonable good faith under the circumstance, and declined to award sanctions.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.