Pansy Tlakula’s two excuses are fishy, says lawyer

2014-06-07 09:57

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) chairperson Pansy Tlakula has given two different reasons to explain her conduct in the R320 million lease saga, but the court should not take either of these into account in its judgment.

This was the argument put forward yesterday by David Unterhalter SC, who is representing a multiparty forum of opposition political parties at the Electoral Court.

The parties have asked the court to recommend that Tlakula be removed from her job.

Unterhalter told Judge Lotter Wepener that Tlakula offering two contrasting explanations for why the IEC approved an irregular lease agreement that benefited her business partner and ANC MP Thaba Mufamadi, should be reason enough to doubt her defence and find against her.

Soon after Public Protector Thuli Madonsela completed her investigation into the flawed tender processes followed by Tlakula and found her guilty of gross irregularities, Tlakula wrote to Parliament questioning Madonsela’s findings.

In her submission to Parliament, Tlakula claimed that she did not follow the prescribed tender process in acquiring new accommodation because the IEC “urgently” needed to enter into a lease agreement for new offices.

Unterhalter told the court on Friday that Tlakula had changed this version in her defence at the Electoral Court and blamed the error on a “lapse of judgement” on her part.

“In her submission to Parliament, Tlakula said she thought she could deviate from procurement policy in the interest of urgency and used that as justification for the irregular expenditure. Now she tells the court she didn’t realise that she was bound by these (procurement policy) norms. She’s inconsistent,” said Unterhalter.

“This is not conduct that amounts to the high standards required of her office because it casts serious doubt on her integrity,” said Unterhalter.

He said Tlakula had “compromised the fairness of the tender process” to the detriment of the IEC and other bidders who lost out in the deal.

“Tlakula’s office should be held to high standards. The fact that she’s been in that office for years and knew what the law was on procurement means that this was not a mistake, but wilful breaking of the law,” he said.

Tlakula, who attended the first day of the hearing on Wednesday, was not in court yesterday.

The matter was adjourned for judgment, but no date has been set for this yet.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.