Rwanda’s other genocide

2010-09-25 11:43

A damning report threatens the country’s peace, writes Tristan McConnell.
My friend nervously scanned the open-air courtyard. His eyes rested for a few ­seconds on a nearby table, where three affluent-looking men in suits sipped beers.

He glanced into a shadowed corner at a young couple out on a date, then at a group of foreign missionaries gathering for dinner.

Satisfied that no one was listening in, my friend leaned close to whisper, “Of course, everyone knows who is Hutu, who is Tutsi.

We just don’t talk about it. We can’t talk about it.”

There are many things you cannot talk about in Rwanda.

You cannot talk about ethnicity because this little central African country was nearly destroyed by tribal enmities just 16 years ago, when extremist Hutus killed about 800?000 Tutsis and moderate members of their own tribe in just three months.

The killers used machetes, hoes, axes and guns to perpetrate one of the most efficient mass slaughters in human history.

Paul Kagame, the country’s de ­facto leader since marching into Rwanda at the head of a Tutsi rebel army in 1994, calls himself a Rwandan.

The words “Tutsi” and “Hutu” have been erased from identity cards and excised from open conversation. But still, everyone knows.
There are laws against “divisionism” and “genocide ideology” that prescribe jail terms for tribal talk.

The laws are intended to prevent the resurrection of deadly ethnic politics, but it is also a very pragmatic concern for Kagame, whose Tutsi ethnic group accounts for only about 15% of Rwanda’s 10?million citizens.

Critics complain that the laws are used to block opposition politicians and stifle dissent.

There are two things you can – indeed must – talk about in Rwanda.

The first is the genocide.

Seemingly every town has its own genocide memorial, mausoleums with neatly arranged rows of skulls and bones on wooden shelves.

The second is that Kagame and his troops halted the genocide and have shown a single-minded determination to rebuild the country ever since.

Last month a draft United Nations report was leaked that forced Rwandans to confront something else that cannot be talked about in Rwanda: What happened in neighbouring Democratic Republic of Congo after the genocide?

For seven months a team of researchers from the United Nations’ (UN) Geneva-based Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights consulted more than 1?500 documents and interviewed more than 1?200 witnesses across Congo’s vast territory.

They concluded that Kagame’s own troops were responsible for a litany of atrocities after the Rwanda genocide was over.

Some have long argued that Rwanda’s invasion was a “counter-genocide”, but never have the allegations been levelled in such detail, and by an international body like the UN.

As Kagame’s army advanced southward through Rwanda in 1994, the Hutu killers fled to neighbouring Congo, hiding among more than a million refugees in squalid camps along the border.

From there the genocidaires reorganised, rearmed and restarted cross-border attacks on Tutsis. In 1996 Kagame ordered an invasion to hunt down the killers.

The UN researchers were tasked with documenting the most serious violations of human rights committed in Congo during a series of wars between 1993 and 2003.

The draft report talks of “the relentless pursuit and mass killing of Hutu refugees, members of the former Armed Forces of Rwanda and militias implicated in the genocide of 1994”.

Revenge attacks might be understandable, given the horrific context of the genocide, but the authors of the report believe a baser motivation may have been at play.

“The systematic and widespread ­attacks?.?.?. reveal a number of damning elements that, if proven before a competent court, could be classified as crimes of genocide,” the draft says.

One example from 1996: It was a Wednesday afternoon in October when a meeting was ordered in Rutshuru, a town set among the forested mountains of eastern Congo.

The Rwandan soldiers who had fought their way to Rutshuru four days earlier began registering people according to tribe.

Nandes were told to go home, Hutus to stay.

“They then separated the men and women on the grounds that the women had to prepare the meal. The women were taken to the Maison de Poste, where they were executed. The men were bound and led in pairs to a sand quarry?.?.?. All of them were then executed with blows of hammers [sic].”

The death toll that day alone was “at least 350 civilians”, according to the draft report. This incident was just one of 617 listed by the researchers.

Of these, one in six were carried out by Rwandan soldiers and their ­allies.

The other killings were by ­various warring parties from eight countries that were embroiled in the Congo fighting.

It is damning, and Rwanda’s government has reacted angrily, dismissing the report as “immoral and unacceptable”.

Even before the draft was leaked, Rwanda’s foreign minister wrote a letter to UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon threatening to withdraw Rwanda’s 3?300 soldiers from UN peacekeeping missions if the report was published, or leaked, in its then-current form.

The leaked report is hugely damaging to Kagame’s moral authority and international standing, all of which stem from his ending of the Rwanda genocide, not attempting a second one in Congo.

Already Kagame has had a torrid year, during which he has faced unprecedented scrutiny.

He won a presidential election in August with 93% of the vote, but two opposition candidates were prevented from registering their parties for the poll, critical newspapers were shut down and the mysterious murders of a journalist and politician as well as the attempted assassination of a dissident general did immense damage to Kagame’s well-cultivated image as Rwanda’s saviour and visionary leader.

A decade and a half since that massacre in Rutshuru, eastern Congo, dreadful things are done every day despite the presence of one of the world’s largest UN peacekeeping missions.

A senior UN official recently conceded the mission had “failed” to protect civilians when he admitted that more than 500 women and girls had been raped in about a month.

The picture in neighbouring Rwanda could scarcely be more different.

It is a short walk from Goma in Congo to Gisenyi in Rwanda, but it takes you from chaos to discipline, from conflict to peace.

Since taking charge, Kagame has effectively leveraged the guilt felt by Western powers who turned their backs on Rwanda during the 1994 genocide.

He has attracted vast amounts of aid and has used the money well.

The corruption, bribes and backhanders that blight Rwanda’s neighbours are hard to find.

Post-genocide reconciliation is a slow but ongoing process, and Rwanda is both peaceful and safe.

Crime is rare; violent crime almost unheard of.

But the leaked UN report points to a darker side of Kagame’s Rwanda, a place where people are afraid to criticise the government, where central control is grasped tightly, where ­everything is creepily disciplined.

Kagame has brought a military discipline to the governing of Rwanda, but with it comes a soldier’s ruthlessness and intolerance of dissent.

It is not just ordinary Rwandans like my friend who are afraid to talk openly.

Foreign diplomats and aid workers in Kigali are guarded when they speak on the telephone for fear of tapping; in their embassies and ­offices, they speak more quietly as local staff pass by.
» McConnell, a journalist based in Nairobi, covers East Africa and the Horn of Africa as a correspondent for the Times of London and GlobalPost. Copyright © 2010 The Nation.
Distributed by Agence Global

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.