State under fire in Agliotti trial

2010-11-17 12:42

The contradictory nature of the evidence contained in the testimony and in the statements of various witnesses in the trial of Brett Kebble murder accused Glenn Agliotti showed that there was a “conspiracy” to “falsely implicate” him in the matter, the High Court in Johannesburg has heard.

“Any attempt to manipulate the evidence of the state witnesses so as to ensure that they testify in chief about matters that are not covered by their statements, more particularly when they were made in terms of the provisions of section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Act, is unconstitutional and renders this trial unfair,” said Agliotti’s defence counsel, Laurance Hodes.

He charged that the state ought to have come to court with their “hands clean”. Instead, the trial was characterised by “missing statements” and “several people said they had made several statements”, yet they still gave a different version when testifying in court.

The state’s key witness, security boss Clinton Nassif, made his final statement in March 2010.

“It takes four years to compile a supplementary statement to give more detail? It’s unheard of, my Lord,” Hodes said.

He also charged that it was “sinister” that the state, in its heads of argument opposing the discharge application, did not once make reference to the court record.

“I challenge them to explain why,” Hodes said.

He said the record made “interesting reading” as it showed that Nassif was a “massive liar”.

“It’s clear that every witness’s testimony is tainted.”

Hodes was arguing for an application to discharge Agliotti from the four counts against him.

“The evidence of Nassif, (Nigel) McGurk and (Alexi) Christopher falls to be disregarded as being contradictory, contradicted by other objective facts such as telephone records, and simply is not credible.

“The organs of the state that withheld statements and documentation until just before the commencement of the trial and during the proceedings as well as to date has resulted in an abuse of the fundamental right of the accused, further resulting in an unfair trial.

“There is no evidence that the accused committed the offences that he is accused of in the indictment,” Hodes argued.

Argument continues.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.