Water affairs loses track of billions, gets qualified audit

2014-10-02 16:15

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Inadequate management systems and poor record keeping involving billions of rands have earned water affairs a qualified annual audit report.

In his report on the financial statements of the department for the period April 1 2013 to March 31 this year, the Auditor-General says certain regional bulk infrastructure grant project commitments were misstated.

His findings are contained in the department’s recently tabled 2013-2014 annual report.

“The department did not have adequate systems in place to maintain records of regional bulk infrastructure grant commitments where the procurement of goods and services have been approved and/or contracted, but where no delivery has taken place at year end.”

This had resulted in these infrastructure grant commitments “being misstated by R576 million for the restatement of the corresponding figure for grant commitments”.

The restatement had been made to rectify a prior year misstatement.

“I was unable to confirm the restatement by alternative means.”

The Auditor-General says that in addition, he was unable to obtain sufficient, appropriate audit evidence for the corresponding amounts disclosed as regional bulk infrastructure grant commitments in the financial statements.

“And I could not confirm the disclosure by alternative means.”

Consequently: “I was unable to determine whether any further adjustments to prior year regional bulk infrastructure grant commitments, stated at R5.9 billion in the financial statements, were necessary.”

In a separate note explaining the basis for his qualified opinion, the Auditor-General says there was a similar misstatement, involving an amount of R630 million.

In this case, he was unable to determine “whether any further adjustments to regional bulk infrastructure grant commitments stated at R5.4 billion in the financial statements were necessary”.

Another reason for the qualified opinion was that the system of controls to maintain records of regional bulk infrastructure grant goods and services received, but not yet paid for at the end of the financial year, were inadequate.

“There were no satisfactory audit procedures that I could perform to obtain reasonable assurance that all outstanding invoices for regional bulk infrastructure grant have been included in the accruals.”

As a consequence, he was unable to determine whether any more adjustments to accruals, stated at R1 billion in the financial statements, were necessary.

A fourth reason for his opinion had to do with poor record keeping and inadequate systems, this time in the department’s records of additions to buildings and other fixed structures.

“[This] resulted in additions being misstated by R204 million.”

A consequence of this lack of sufficient and appropriate audit evidence meant he was unable to determine “whether any further adjustments to additions, stated at R1.5 billion [in 2013 it was R358.2 million] in the financial statements, were necessary”.

In a separate report within the annual report, water affairs’s own audit committee says it “notes with concern” the Auditor-General’s qualified opinion.

It concedes the department “did not have adequate systems in place” to maintain certain records.

“The committee is particularly concerned that the basis of the qualification was also raised in the previous financial year.

“While the department has presented action plans to address the issues raised ... the issues were not fully cleared and were repeated as a basis for qualification,” it says.

The department had an allocated budget of R10.4 billion for the 2013-2014 financial year, of which it spent 98.8%.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24


6 myths about male cancer

It is important to be aware of the most prevalent cancer diseases amongst men in our country.


You won't want to miss...

Who are the highest paid models of 2017?
10 gorgeous plus-sized models who aren't Ashley Graham
5 top leg exercises for men
10 best dressed men of 2017
Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.