Allegations need answers

2008-08-05 00:00

WHEN a decade ago the South African National Defence Review said that the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) needed to be re-equipped to meet the needs of the new democracy, this newspaper was sympathetic to the general proposal. The Witness was particularly supportive of the case for the South African navy which had been the Cinderella of the services and starved of resources by successive Nationalist governments for half a century. While South Africa faces no immediate maritime threat, the country has an exceptionally long coastline and requires ships to protect its fishing resources. Whether the most suitable vessels were purchased is, however, now a matter of debate.

The “arms deal” signed in 1999, totalling R30 billion at that time, has been a burden to taxpayers ever since. It has also become a sore in the body politic as endless allegations of corruption have surfaced, while the authorities have obdurately refused to appoint a judicial commission of inquiry to investigate the matter.

At the weekend a staggering new allegation was published by a Sunday newspaper: that a German shipbuilding company paid President Thabo Mbeki R30 million to guarantee that it won the submarine contract. Mbeki allegedly gave R2 million of this to Jacob Zuma and the remaining R28 million to the African National Congress (ANC).

While the paper devoted its own resources to the story for six months, it was drawing on a secret report compiled last year by a United Kingdom specialist risk consultancy which was commissioned to investigate the worldwide activities and questionable business practices of Man Ferrostaal (which won the contract to supply three submarines to South Africa). Man Ferrostaal promised a reciprocal deal to build a stainless steel mill at Coega, an offset project which a feasibility study warned as being being risky and likely to fail, and which has done so.

These are extremely serious allegations, but so far they have been simply shrugged off by the presidency and Mbeki himself. That’s not good enough. If they are a newspaper calumny, then surely the paper should be sued for libel. It has not been, so they probably have at least a basis of truth. A newspaper is unlikely to risk major financial damage by making such claims were it not sure of its ground. In that case, there should be a judicial inquiry as the only way to put the matter to rest.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.