An issue of mind-set

2010-01-08 00:00

IN December, the Cabinet accepted­ the Department of Co-operative­ Governance and Traditional Affairs’ Turnaround Strategy for local government. Notwithstanding a series of adverse audit reports over several years, mounting municipal debt and the common perception that, generally, local government in South Africa is a disaster, it was the spate of community protests, some violent and shameful, that appears to have prompted urgent action.

Some of these protests, perhaps even all of them, were entirely justified­, I’m sure. Promises of a better life for all have not materialised in marginalised and poverty-stricken communities where patience over 15 years has been characteristic. In almost all cases, the protesters highlighted either corruption or mismanagement, or both, and referred to councillors and officials who were either lining their own pockets or abjectly incompetent in the execution of their duties. As a result of election promises, protesters were short on insight when it comes to appreciating that the delivery of every service costs money, and somebody has to pay.

Even among people who can afford the rates and tariffs, there has developed a reluctance to pay. We want better service, but we are not happy to pay for it. This is understandable in view of wide perceptions that municipal income is being squandered, sometimes into the pockets of councillors or officials, but also on causes which have little to do with the delivery of basic services and the welfare of the municipality’s population. Indeed, there is sometimes little evidence to suggest that municipal leaders are concerned about such welfare until there is some mobilisation to protest.

The Turnaround Strategy lays a strong emphasis on responsiveness to communities and sets out plans to strengthen ward committees and their constructive operation. While this division of municipal affairs into wards representing what are loosely called “communities” may pre-empt outbreaks of protest action, I believe­ that effective municipal governance and management are about a lot more than ward projects.

Indeed, half the councillors are there by virtue of their ranking on the party list and not as a result of voters directly demonstrating their acceptability. The measurement of ward committee success seems to relate to whether the ward’s pet project is accepted or not. It becomes unwholesomely competitive when limited funds and political allegiances join forces­ as determinants.

The new strategy even advocates ward budgets to be controlled by the wards themselves, each of which should have its own “economic development product” and ward development plan. In this paradigm, the councillor is to be the “governor” of the ward and the CDW the CEO. (A CDW is a community development worker, a position which the government is training people to fill. Their task is to liaise between the community and the municipality, which is exactly what might be expected of the ward councillor.)

All this seems to be a theoretical concession to democracy which, in my view, gives little hope for the better performance of municipalities, which are not conglomerates of wards, but holistic entities in which communities are not confined to residential localities alone. The responsibility for delivery has already been devolved, unsuccessfully in the main, to district and local municipalities, and this strategy seems to advocate a further delegation to an even lower level.

It is worth considering, in this context, that citizens are still forming ratepayers’ associations in the belief that these will give them the necessary voice in municipal affairs. It points to the fact that ward committees are not working and enjoy little credibility among those who pay for the city’s maintenance.

Part of the Turnaround Strategy document is devoted to an “Outline of key intervention areas”. My overriding impression of these 12 pages of columns devoted to the planned intervention and whether national, provincial or local government should take responsibility for it, is that it will be up to the national government to ensure success or not.

To my mind, however, apart from a more practical regulatory framework and less emphasis on theoretical compliance, the major interventions need to be effected by political parties and their representatives among the councillors and officials. It is an issue of mind-set; firstly, in the choice of those to be deployed or appointed, and, secondly, in the attitude and competence that these people bring to their responsibilities.

• Andrew Layman is a former headmaster and now the CEO of the Pietermaritzburg Chamber of Business.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.