Appeal denied for jailed legal secretary

2012-06-12 00:00

PIETERMARITZBURG regional court magistrate Jennifer Anthoo yesterday turned down an application by former conveyancing secretary Candida du Plessis for leave to appeal against her prison sentence.

A few hours earlier the high court in Pietermaritzburg granted a final order sequestrating Du Plessis’s estate.

Du Plessis (40) was sentenced to an effective seven years’ imprisonment for stealing R1,2 million from her employers, Stowell & Company, over three years. She pleaded guilty.

Her advocate, Gideon Scheltema SC, submitted yesterday that the sentence imposed on her was unduly harsh and severe.

He submitted that the regional court had erred in not imposing a sentenced which would have allowed Du Plessis to be placed under correctional supervision after serving a period of imprisonment.

He said such a sentence would have allowed her to do extended community service, attend a reputable course in financial management and receive necessary psychotherapy.

He argued that the court had placed insufficient weight on the fact that Du Plessis’s actions were influenced by “traumatic events she was subjected to for her entire life until she reached the age of 25”.

During the trial a psychologist gave evidence in camera, which the media was barred from reporting.

Scheltema submitted yesterday that Du Plessis’s conduct was “not motivated by greed but rather by factors of a complex, unique and exceptional psychological nature which reduced her moral blameworthiness”.

The court had found that she had acted in a devious manner when there was no evidence of inherent deviousness, and had erred in finding Du Plessis had not shown genuine remorse.

Scheltema submitted the court was bound by what was said by Du Plessis in her statement when she pleaded guilty and which was accepted by the state. He suggested the court was wrong to find that the fact that Du Plessis had exploited poor internal controls at her firm was an aggravating factor.

Anthoo said she had fully considered all evidence led in mitigation and aggravation of sentence.

She was satisfied that there was no prospect that another court would rule that the sentence imposed on Du Plessis was shocking or inappropriate.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.