Breytenbach: NPA ‘witch hunt’

2013-07-03 00:00

THE National Prosecution Authority (NPA) had acted outside the law by not reinstating advocate Glynnis Breytenbach to her position as regional head of the NPA’s specialised commercial crime unit in Pretoria.

“It is a constitutional violation. It is a breach of constitutional imperative. Secondly, it is a breach of her employment contract. By transferring her to a position which is not the same as the one she held before, her contract of employment has been breached,” said advocate Andrew Redding SC, Breytenbach’s legal representative in the Johannesburg labour court, yesterday.

“What began as an investigation into her conduct blew up into … a federal case against her,” Redding said, adding that from the day the NPA had levelled allegations against Breytenbach, the prosecuting ­authority had done all it could to prevent her returning to her position in order to prevent her from getting the files on former police crime intelligence head Richard Mdluli.

Breytenbach asked the court for an interdict against the NPA and its acting head, advocate Nomgcobo Jiba, to declare her transfer invalid.

Breytenbach said the NPA had committed a breach of contract when it did not reinstate her after her suspension was lifted and she was acquitted on all 15 charges following an NPA disciplinary hearing on May 27.

Redding said the case was urgent and in the public interest because history showed that the NPA had interfered before and was also interfering with Breytenbach’s independence. He said the three new charges Jiba had laid against her constituted a “witch hunt”.

Advocate William Mokhari SC, for the NPA, said Breytenbach has in more than a year failed to provide any proof to substantiate her repeated allegation that the NPA was trying to get rid of her to protect Mdluli.

Mokhari said the case was not urgent and should in fact be scrapped.

“The position that she has been deployed to does not take away her right as a prosecutor to prosecute matters,” he said.

Redding said the NPA protected prosecutors against interference and that the NPA should obey its own laws. Judge Hilary Rabkin-Naicker reserved judgment.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24


And the Paws24 and Hill's winners are ...

Find out who the winners of our Paws24 pet pics and Q&a competitions are...



Keep your family and pets safe from rabies
5 scientific benefits of owning a cat
Why we love cats
8 great natural remedies for your pet
Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.