Cautious optimism

2008-09-17 00:00

On Monday Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe and opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) leader Morgan Tsvangirai signed a power-sharing agreement. Mugabe will remain president and head the cabinet, with Tsvangirai as prime minister, and Arthur Mutambara, leader of a breakaway faction of the MDC, as deputy prime minister.

Although those present greeted the signing with enthusiasm, hundreds of Zanu-PF and MDC supporters outside the building clashed and had to be separated by riot police. This is surely an indication that it would be inappropriate to treat the event with anything more than cautious optimism, a view confirmed by Mugabe’s behaviour after the signing, as shown in many international televised reports. For, broken-record-like, he yet again harshly criticised “colonialists”, especially Britain and the United States, blaming them for all of Zimbabwe’s ills and claiming that they had conspired to oust him. And, despite the beaming handshakes, he seemed unable to bring himself to use Tsvangirai’s name, as if in a perverse belief that to name the man who is now a senior member of government would be to accord him power — and diminish his own. On their side the MDC must have wondered what Mugabe was doing there at all: this year’s election debacle had made it clear that a majority of Zimbabweans wanted him gone.

This augurs poorly for a smooth passage towards democracy and economic recovery. Further, even “cautious optimism” may well turn to pessimism when one assesses Mbeki’s role. For years as the world watched Mugabe wreck the Zimbabwean economy, starving and impoverishing the people and driving millions of them to leave, Mbeki and his “quiet diplomacy” were ridiculed: in all that time he failed to respond to calls for decisive action, even in the face of total collapse. So what suddenly impelled him to abandon his softly-softly tactics and to force the issue? One possibility is that having lost power and credibility at home since Polokwane, and having most recently been humiliated over the Zuma affair, he is desperate to save face. The forcing of the Zimbabwe deal may be an attempt to do that, thus, when his now discredited presidency ends, securing himself a future as, perhaps, a roving diplomat in Africa.

In other words, it may be that the Zimbabwe signing was not the natural outcome of intelligent debate arriving at true agreement, but something artificial, in which cracks will very soon appear. This is surely not a secure foundation on which to rebuild Zimbabwe, a task requiring the full co-operation of all involved, an acknowledgment of past mistakes, and unremitting hard work.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.