Commissars coming?

2009-01-27 00:00

APARTHEID was a crime against humanity and a heresy. And robust opposition was morally justifiable. Any other interpretation of late 20th-century South African history would be hard to argue and few seem inclined to try. The finer details are, naturally, fertile ground for debate.

Late last year, a letter notionally written to martyred Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK) member Solomon Mahlangu, and signed by another former combatant with a Durban address, came into the public domain. Its exact standing is unknown, but given the current conflicts in South African politics it provides interesting food for thought and some alarming pointers to the future.

Some of the letter is perfectly reasonable. It notes that the struggle was waged for various freedoms, including those of association and speech now being exercised by the Congress of the People (Cope). It also correctly records the progress made in bettering the lives of millions of citizens since 1994 and the fact that much remains unfulfilled. Looking at the affairs of MK, it applauds the process of reburial, repatriation of remains and the promises recently made by the government regarding housing and training programmes.

But having conceded Cope’s right to exist, the author condemns it as counter-revolutionary. This is a puzzling turn of phrase for a country that thankfully never experienced a revolution. Cope is also accused of “brazenly stealing the history and undermining the legacy of the African National Congress”; and it is portrayed colourfully as “perched on the shoulders of global counter-revolutionary formations”. This is standard fare from such quarters, ignoring the fact that the ANC has multiple legacies, some of which have clearly been inherited by Cope.

“Democratic South Africa,” continues the letter, “owes its existence to the sacrifices of MK heroes and heroines”, backing up other claims that MK was in the vanguard of the struggle. This is dangerous, delusory nonsense. Apartheid was brought down by three main forces: changing global political and economic conditions; its own internal contradictions (and realisation of this within the National Party); and the mass democratic movement. Violence played little part and MK was no more than a minor irritant for the South African security state.

The letter to Mahlangu claims that MK will lead from the front in engineering the ANC’s election victory this year: apparently, more than before, the ANC is now dependent upon it. This may explain why, increasingly, we are treated to the strange sight of militarily-clad supporters at party rallies. Even more significant, MK is calling for the incoming government to endorse “an accurate account of our history in the curriculum of mainstream education”. South Africa’s history is allegedly distorted and so-called MK commissars are needed to educate the young about the past.

MK’s record was inglorious even by the standards of African liberation movements. Its programme of armed propaganda and targeting military objectives was legitimate, but it later went beyond the rules of war through acts of blatant terrorism. How, exactly, will the commissars explain this? MK made the most elementary mistakes through ill-discipline and incompetence and when faced by mutiny in Angola in 1984, it turned in on itself. Its security arm, Mbokodo, operating with official sanction, beat, starved, tortured and murdered loyal ANC members in true Stalinist style. How will this be portrayed?

The armed struggle was both sideshow and strategic error. Blind to reality, it confronted the South African regime at its strongest point in territory totally unsuitable for guerrilla warfare; a slave to the ideology of other places at other times. From the very outset, ANC leaders Walter Sisulu, Rusty Bernstein and Ahmed Kathrada regarded it as irresponsible. The nonviolent, political engagement of the United Democratic Front was 1 000 times more effective in bringing down apartheid. And it was appropriate to the future challenges of a modern democratic society, as opposed to one that could have resembled a Soviet clone.

In short, members of a violent and questionable distraction want to muscle their way into the history books. A liberal democracy should be highly alarmed at the prospect of men more used to wielding guns than pens intent on rewriting history.

And there is about this intervention a disturbing sense of déjà vu: north of the border, when the going got tough for the ruling party, men calling themselves war veterans suddenly emerged from the woodwork demanding various privileges. History clearly shows where that has led Zimbabwe.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.