Corrosive corruption

2008-02-04 00:00

If the recent United Nations anti-corruption conference in Bali needed a symbolic event, it was provided by the simultaneous death of ex-President Suharto of Indonesia. His ill-gotten gains from running the country as a family business may have amounted to as much as $35 billion. This is an all-time record in a world league of infamy that now accounts for a staggering sum of more than $1 trillion per annum.

The obvious results of corruption are individual enrichment at the expense of ordinary, often poor, citizens; distorted decision making and skewed development. Perhaps the most damaging long-term consequence is lowered public confidence in national institutions and democratic processes.

This is evident in the current conflict in Kenya where rampant corruption, unchecked by state structures, is blamed for mass deprivation. Indeed, Africa has produced some notoriously venal and unscrupulous leaders — Mobutu Sese Seko of the DRC and Sani Abacha of Nigeria each looted their countries of over $5 billion.

African democrats should applaud attempts to give teeth to the UN Convention against Corruption agreed to in 2005. Those responsible for its implementation are looking for increased international co-operation regarding prosecutions and the recovery and return of looted national assets. One top official has vividly described corruption as a communicable disease that is spiralling out of control like a pandemic.

Although a global phenomenon, it is particularly damaging to developing countries, especially since economists estimate it can depress growth by up to one percent per annum. Corruption, like the tango, requires two participants. For every crooked Third-World leader there is an array of multinational companies illegally feeding greed. It is for these reasons that the UN wants to give a public face to activity that usually operates in the shadows.

South Africans have good reason to think long and hard about this. The arms deal was signed at much the same time as the government was warned about the current electricity crisis. Was power supply ignored because the purchase of weapons had potential for kickbacks? Was this an example of the tendency of corruption to produce decisions out of kilter with real national interest?

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.