Informal censorship remains in SA

2010-03-15 00:00

“BRING back ‘Gatsha’ book, say young Reds” (The Witness, March 4). This headline awoke vivid memories almost 20 years old, but more importantly it reopens the censorship debate. The Young Communist League (YCL) is referring to the book by Mzala (the struggle name of Jabulani Nxumalo) titled Gatsha Buthelezi: Chief With a Double Agenda published in London by Zed Books in early 1988. And the YCL is right.

It’s a popular but scholarly work of history in which Mzala examines Mangosuthu Buthelezi’s political past, the administration of the KwaZulu bantustan and Inkatha’s methods. Among other matters he questions Buthelezi’s claim to a hereditary leadership role and his anti-apartheid credibility. Together with Gerry Maré and Georgina Hamilton’s An Appetite for Power (1987) it was an important antidote to a number of sycophantic books that had appeared with monotonous regularity. Mzala was, however, criticised for not addressing the issue of Inkatha’s popularity and its successful mobilisation strategy.

Mzala died in February 1991, three years after publication of his book, but just two months after his death university libraries were hit with a lawyer’s letter demanding that it be removed from their shelves. In the opinion of Friedman & Friedman the book was defamatory and libraries could be faced with a legal action should they continue to circulate it. Mzala had previously asked why he had not been sued for libel and pointed out that he had interviewed Buthelezi for the book. Indeed, just weeks after the lawyer’s letter was delivered, the funding scandal and Inkatha’s links with the security forces were exposed.

Zed Books had obtained legal opinion that the edited text contained nothing actionable in British law, but they were cautious about the conservative South African judiciary. Zed’s South African agents, David Philip, were contacted by Buthelezi’s lawyers and the book was not released in this country. Libraries, of course, simply ordered it from their overseas suppliers. Other copies, said John Daniel (then Africa editor of Zed), came over the border in the backpacks of Umkhonto we Sizwe soldiers.

The book has never been restricted by the state and yet has remained as elusive under a democratic dispensation as any banned book in the apartheid era. It was, however, widely and favourably reviewed by eminent African scholars. In 1991, universities reacted cautiously, well aware of Buthelezi’s litigious streak and the Committee of University Principals recommended compliance. The University of Natal followed this advice but was nevertheless subjected to an attack by Ilanga, which labelled its academics “ANC fetch-and-carry boys”. Two months after the lawyer’s letter, the local university authorities instructed its librarians to return the book to the shelves.

Librarians were outspoken, calling the legal threat a new form of censorship, and the Anti-Censorship Action Group likened Buthelezi to the “book burning despots of the past”. Jenny Friedman became very involved in the increasingly public row and ludicrously accused librarians of trying to intimidate her client by going to the press. Unwisely she quoted Iago from Shakespeare’s Othello and the famous complaint about the filching of his “good name”, seemingly unaware of his unsavoury character.

If Mzala’s book is indeed still lurking in the banned-book cupboards of some South African libraries and unavailable through local booksellers, this is a serious matter of censorship and a negation of our hard-won democracy. As historian Paul Maylam pointed out in 1991, suppression of the book was based purely on opinion and a legal threat. There has never been any indication of the extent of the claimed libel: a word, a sentence, a paragraph — or more? No court has found any part of the book defamatory in the sense that its content is untrue, written with malicious intent and not in the public interest.

Maylam called for public debate in the interests of democratic culture. His words have been heeded by the judiciary as defamation law has been relaxed in recent years, especially where it affects public figures. He also worried about the future of political biography in South Africa, an unfounded fear as this sector of the publishing industry is flourishing.

But this particular book remains in the twilight. Those who wield power and influence must expect to have their backgrounds and beliefs exposed — it goes with the territory — and public interest and democracy often outweigh the odd inaccuracy. It’s all part of the bruising nature of real democracy. Yet, while the massive formal structure of censorship that characterised the apartheid years has crumbled, informal means of suppressing information still thrive. One is the reconciliation call by the Inkatha Freedom Party’s Musa Zondi. If Mzala’s work does indeed contain lies and propaganda as claimed by Zondi, let’s hear exactly what they are and the IFP’s version of the truth. It should long ago have exercised a right of reply rather than issue legal threats.

Much effort has been expended in trying to keep this book out of South African readers’ hands. The suspicion remains that its content is not untrue, just highly embarrassing.

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.